2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1020618211437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major obstacle in the development of mechanical methods for the preliminary treatment of lignocellulose is the difficulty of scaling laboratory developments and the transition to industrial equipment (Akhtar, Scott, Swaney, & Shipley, 2000;Masarin et al, 2009). At present, the majority of studies are carried out in the laboratory (Hilgert, Meine, Rinaldi, & Schüth, 2013;Lin et al, 2010) and are aimed at superfine grinding of the raw material (Millett, Effland, & Caulfield, 1979;Silva, Couturier, Berrin, Buléon, & Rouau, 2012), achieving the maximal possible reactivity of cellulose (Alekseeva, Rozhkova, & Prusov, 1997;Prusov, Zheleznov, Alekseeva, Padokhin, & Rozhkova, 2002), which is often disadvantageous from the viewpoint of energy consumption ( When pretreatment plant raw materials, mechanochemical treatment allows one to increase the reactivity of the substances incorporated in the treated materials due to an increase in the specific surface area (including the area suitable for interaction with reagents and enzymes), a decrease in cellulose crystallinity and a general disordering of the supramolecular structure of cell walls.…”
Section: Principles Of the Mechanical And Mechanochemical Methods Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major obstacle in the development of mechanical methods for the preliminary treatment of lignocellulose is the difficulty of scaling laboratory developments and the transition to industrial equipment (Akhtar, Scott, Swaney, & Shipley, 2000;Masarin et al, 2009). At present, the majority of studies are carried out in the laboratory (Hilgert, Meine, Rinaldi, & Schüth, 2013;Lin et al, 2010) and are aimed at superfine grinding of the raw material (Millett, Effland, & Caulfield, 1979;Silva, Couturier, Berrin, Buléon, & Rouau, 2012), achieving the maximal possible reactivity of cellulose (Alekseeva, Rozhkova, & Prusov, 1997;Prusov, Zheleznov, Alekseeva, Padokhin, & Rozhkova, 2002), which is often disadvantageous from the viewpoint of energy consumption ( When pretreatment plant raw materials, mechanochemical treatment allows one to increase the reactivity of the substances incorporated in the treated materials due to an increase in the specific surface area (including the area suitable for interaction with reagents and enzymes), a decrease in cellulose crystallinity and a general disordering of the supramolecular structure of cell walls.…”
Section: Principles Of the Mechanical And Mechanochemical Methods Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and its reactivity in a mixture of organic solvents: methylmorpholine N-oxide monohydrate and dimethyl sulfoxide, was investigated in [42]. Increasing the frequency of the mechanical effect decreased the particle size and electrophoretic mobility and increased the surface charge density and solubility, and decreased the viscosity of the cellulose solutions obtained due to a decrease in its DP, development of microporosity, and an increase in the internal surface area of the polymer as a result of the mechanical effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%