2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015349523170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3), as in Ge〈Au〉 [19] and InSb [8], the energy of deep impurity states does not depend on hydrostatic pressure. The value of pressure coefficient for the gap between the bottom of the conduction band and the deep impurity level agrees with the pressure coefficient of the width of the forbidden gap [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3), as in Ge〈Au〉 [19] and InSb [8], the energy of deep impurity states does not depend on hydrostatic pressure. The value of pressure coefficient for the gap between the bottom of the conduction band and the deep impurity level agrees with the pressure coefficient of the width of the forbidden gap [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Pressure (GPa) Figure 3 Energy-spectrum realignment in InAs with deep impurity centers under pressure according to results of the given work and [8,9]. The energy levels of deep acceptor ε a , resonance donor ε d and their pressure coefficients are calculated for 300 K. It was also supposed that the total electron concentrations at the impurity centers n i and in the conduction band n c is a constant:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations