1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007419406590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fracture toughness is commonly measured under tensile loads, or in the compressive Brazilian test, but a more useful geometry would stabilise the fracture process to aid accurate measurement of key quantities. Our adopted technique allowed for controlled crack growth that improved upon the traditional 3-and 4-point bend tests, Brazil tests, and Brazil tests with initial damage [4,5,8,9]. Indeed, one of the challenges of measuring K IC using the conventional crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) technique, is that the fatigue crack initiation load and the monotonic crack growth load, are closer in magnitude than the best practice methods requires [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture toughness is commonly measured under tensile loads, or in the compressive Brazilian test, but a more useful geometry would stabilise the fracture process to aid accurate measurement of key quantities. Our adopted technique allowed for controlled crack growth that improved upon the traditional 3-and 4-point bend tests, Brazil tests, and Brazil tests with initial damage [4,5,8,9]. Indeed, one of the challenges of measuring K IC using the conventional crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) technique, is that the fatigue crack initiation load and the monotonic crack growth load, are closer in magnitude than the best practice methods requires [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brazilian disk specimen has also been used to study the fracture toughness of bimaterial systems [11] and a unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite under mixedmode loading conditions [16,28].…”
Section: Sbn Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of test specimens have been proposed to measure interfacial fracture toughness [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Suo and Hutchinson [17] developed a universal relation to associate the actual stress intensity factor for an interface crack between a very thin layer of secondary material and bulk material with the apparent stress intensity factor for a similar crack in the bulk material without the interlayer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is strongly believed that fracture toughness is the property that is most sensitive to chemical and microstructural changes that occur in these materials. Initial characterization was pursued using several common techniques including 3 and 4 point bend tests, Brazil tests, and Brazil tests with initial damage [2][3][4][5][6]. Each of these test geometries were non-ideal because the crack growth rates were not easily controlled and there was significant variability in test results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%