“…As summarized in Rood et al (2011), mismatches might arise due to the clustering of past earthquakes (e.g., Rockwell et al, 2000), resulting in an overestimate of geologic strain release rates; geologic deformation accommodated by undetected structures (e.g., Sheehan, 2007), resulting in an underestimate of geologic strain release rates; or geodetic sampling early in the interseismic cycle (e.g., Peltzer et al, 2001;Dixon et al, 2003), resulting in geodetic strain rates that are higher than the average interseismic rate (e.g., when geodetic sampling measures viscoelastic relaxation). Importantly, some slip rate variations have been shown to record coordination of strain between neighboring fault systems (e.g., Lee et al, 2009;Petronis et al, 2009;Nagorsen-Rinke et al, 2013) as opposed to the timing of data collection relative to seismic events. Thus, when evaluating temporal and spatial changes in vertical displacement rates for the Wassuk Range fault, we will need to account for the potential impacts of one or more of the above factors in our interpretation of deformation in the context of the Walker Lane -ECSZ system.…”