2011
DOI: 10.5506/aphyspolb.42.659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: We have investigated the isoscalar giant monopole resonances (ISGMR) in 112−124 Sn and 106−116 Cd nuclei using inelastic scattering of 386-MeV α-particles at extremely forward angles, including 0 • . The strength distributions for various multipoles were extracted by a multipole decomposition analysis based on the expected angular distributions of the respective multipoles. From the ISGMR results, a value of K τ ∼ −500 MeV is obtained for the asymmetry term in the nuclear incompressibility.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion our work suggests that, based on the most precise and up-to-date data on GMR energies of Sn and Cd isotopes, together with a selected set of data from 56 Ni to 208 Pb, the value of K 0 is higher than generally accepted by a considerable margin. This result, 250 < K 0 < 315 MeV has been obtained without any microscopic model assumptions, except (marginally) the Coulomb effect, and revealed the essential role of surface properties in vibrating nuclei.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In conclusion our work suggests that, based on the most precise and up-to-date data on GMR energies of Sn and Cd isotopes, together with a selected set of data from 56 Ni to 208 Pb, the value of K 0 is higher than generally accepted by a considerable margin. This result, 250 < K 0 < 315 MeV has been obtained without any microscopic model assumptions, except (marginally) the Coulomb effect, and revealed the essential role of surface properties in vibrating nuclei.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…K 0 interchangeably according to the context. The second significant difference is that we useẼ 3 GMR energies in calculation of K A (1), consistent with the scaling model, instead ofẼ 1 , used in [49,50,56] difference in GMR energies and thus in K A .…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations