1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1020967918594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All samples were analysed with and without co-injection with consecutive n-alkane standards for the determination of the Kovats Retention Index (KI). Alkanes and alkenes were identified by their KI (Carlson et al, 1998) and fragmentation patterns (Nelson et al, 1981;Pomonis, 1989;Carlson et al, 1999;Howard, 2001). Alkene identification was confirmed after derivatisation with dimethyl disulphide for determining the double-bond position (Francis & Veland, 1981).…”
Section: Extraction and Identification Of Cuticular Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples were analysed with and without co-injection with consecutive n-alkane standards for the determination of the Kovats Retention Index (KI). Alkanes and alkenes were identified by their KI (Carlson et al, 1998) and fragmentation patterns (Nelson et al, 1981;Pomonis, 1989;Carlson et al, 1999;Howard, 2001). Alkene identification was confirmed after derivatisation with dimethyl disulphide for determining the double-bond position (Francis & Veland, 1981).…”
Section: Extraction and Identification Of Cuticular Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were analyzed using GC-MS Postrun Analysis for Windows (Shimadzu Corporation) and the chemical compounds were identied based on their mass spectra by comparison with the NIST Library data and with standard alkane solutions for compounds with 9 to 25 and with 21 to 40 carbon atoms (Fluka). The branched alkanes were identied based on comparisons with mass spectral data from Monnin et al 27 and Carlson et al 36,37 The relative abundance of each compound was estimated from the proportion of the peak area of the total ion chromatograms. The amount of each compound in each sample was grouped in n-alkanes, alkenes, and branched alkanes, and their average proportions were compared between treatments (ber vs. ber and hexane).…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%