SummaryThis report summarizes the responses of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) subjected to the anesthetic, tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222), during surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters (ATs) and passive integrated transponders (PITs). The Columbia Basin Surgical Protocol Steering Committee expressed concern that the recommendation of a 10-minute maximum exposure to MS-222 could be too long for a juvenile salmonid resulting in increased behavioral and physiological costs, and/or decreased survival. These undesirable results are further problematic because survival study assumptions require that fish are representative of fish in the river that have not been subjected to handling, holding, and surgical implantation. Thus, there is a need to determine the amount of time fish can be held in knockdown anesthetic without negatively influencing their survival and thus fish passage survival models. The study reported here examined the relationship between stress indicators for several blood analytes and biochemistries (sodium, calcium, potassium, blood pH, plasma cortisol), time under anesthesia, and number of days post-exposure to anesthesia in juvenile yearling Chinook salmon (YCH). Fish were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: anesthetic control (no anesthetic exposure, no surgical implantation) surgical control (exposed to anesthesia and removed when reached Stage 4 anesthesia, no surgical implantation) one of seven treatments where fish remained in the anesthetic for 0, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12, or 15 minutes beyond the "knockdown" time (KD) when they reached Stage 4 anesthesia and were surgically implanted with an AT and PIT.Controls and KD treatment exposure groups were further assigned to one of four post-surgical implantation-monitoring days: 0, 1, 7, or 14 days after treatment. Day 0 fish were immediately sampled after the anesthetic treatment; while 1, 7, and 14 day fish were held until their respective day for sampling and termination. The purpose of the study was to address three questions:1. Did the MS-222 KD treatment exposure groups result in differential mortality for surgically implanted fish?2. Did the stress responses of juvenile Chinook salmon vary significantly as a result of KD on day 0 and when compared to the anesthetic control fish on day 0?3. Did the stress responses of juvenile Chinook salmon vary significantly as a result of the KD when examined on post-surgical implantation-monitoring days 1, 7, 14; and when compared to surgical control fish over the same time periods?Although we expected to see mortalities in the 12-and 15-minute extended KD treatment exposures, there were no mortalities in any of the controls or KD exposure times. This suggests that perhaps: 1) the duration of exposure (KD), at 80 mg/L, in anesthetic prior to surgical implantation does not directly affect fish survival over the time range tested; 2) the life stage of holdover juvenile YCH may be less susceptible to anesthetic stress and thus mortality than actively outmigrating ju...