2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016351406336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop the Korean version of World Health Organization Quality of Life study assessment instrument (WHOQOL) and WHOQOL-BREF, an abbreviated version of WHOQOL and to identify contributing factors in the quality of life of Koreans. The WHOQOL and WHOQOL-BREF were translated into colloquial Korean according to instructions of the WHOQOL study group. Then the Korean questionnaire was applied to 538 subjects, composed of 171 medical patients and 367 healthy subjects who volunteered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
84
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
84
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality of Life was also evaluated with the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Scale (Min et al, 2002). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality of Life was also evaluated with the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Scale (Min et al, 2002). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its abbreviated version, the WHOQOL-BREF, contains 26 items and is used for epidemiological surveys and clinical trials (WHOQOL Group, 1998a). Psychometric studies support the WHOQOL-BREF’s validity for general populations (Saxena et al, 2001; Skevington et al, 2004; WHOQOL Group, 1998a) and in many countries (Min et al, 2002; Noerholm et al, 2004; Xia et al, 2012; Yao et al, 2002). However, some international studies failed to replicate the original item structure (Moreno et al, 2006; Yao et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…higher scores denoting a better QOL. The validity and reliability of the Korean version of the WHOQOL-BREF have been previously evaluated and reported as satisfactory [24]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%