2005
DOI: 10.1155/imrn.2005.1717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: In the 1990s, Cherednik introduced the double affine Hecke algebra [2]. In terms of the polynomial representation of the algebra, Macdonald's conjecture was solved in [3,4] for reduced root systems (and in [12, 13] for nonreduced (C ∨ , C) case). For the root system of type A, a classification of irreducible representations of a certain class is given in [6,14,15]. In [1], it is shown that finite-dimensional quotients of the polynomial representation by the kernel of some degenerate bilinear form are irreduci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.4) which satisfy the wheel condition (3.1). The corresponding problem in the trigonometric case was solved by Kasatani in [27], leading to a a connection to nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials [28].…”
Section: Wheel Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.4) which satisfy the wheel condition (3.1). The corresponding problem in the trigonometric case was solved by Kasatani in [27], leading to a a connection to nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials [28].…”
Section: Wheel Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jack polynomials, both symmetric [22,23] and non-symmetric [17], enjoy (k, r) clustering properties at the following negative value of the coupling…”
Section: Generalized Exclusion Principle (K R) Admissibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…although in the following we focus on n = 2. For (k, r)-admissible partitions S N ↑ ⊗ S N ↓ symmetric Jack polynomials are well defined at α = − k+1 r−1 , and enjoy the clustering properties inherited from the wheel condition of [17,18]. In particular…”
Section: Generalized Exclusion Principle (K R) Admissibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, s σ(a) )(we postpone to §5.2 the definition of the weights of the B, C variables of the ring, which we do not need for now). Finally, for x any linear combination of such monomials, we define in(x) to be the sum of monomials of x for which the function wt is minimal.If we let P denote the space of Plücker relations, cf(12), viewed as linear forms on such monomials, namely P = span p s 1 . .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%