2011 20th European Conference on Circuit Theory and Design (ECCTD) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ecctd.2011.6043288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 1GS/s low-power low-kickback noise comparator in CMOS process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation method must simulate the actual behavior of the system and the factual events that may affect the precision of the operation. As the comparison process can be divided into some sub operations; like resetting the remained effect of the previous samples, evaluating the current sample to steer the output direction and latching the output data up to the digital levels [1]; the simulation method is to cover all these sub operations for a vast verity of the structures employed as a comparator. The simulation method has to imitate every post fabrication tests from different sights of view in order to evaluate the comparator in terms of the speed (sample rate), accuracy (resolution), power consumption, noise, clock feed through, kickback noise, offset, latency, result valid time, metastability and so on.…”
Section: Efficient Simulation Methods For the Comparatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The simulation method must simulate the actual behavior of the system and the factual events that may affect the precision of the operation. As the comparison process can be divided into some sub operations; like resetting the remained effect of the previous samples, evaluating the current sample to steer the output direction and latching the output data up to the digital levels [1]; the simulation method is to cover all these sub operations for a vast verity of the structures employed as a comparator. The simulation method has to imitate every post fabrication tests from different sights of view in order to evaluate the comparator in terms of the speed (sample rate), accuracy (resolution), power consumption, noise, clock feed through, kickback noise, offset, latency, result valid time, metastability and so on.…”
Section: Efficient Simulation Methods For the Comparatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because in fast or slow corners the charging procedure becomes fast or slow respectively, and the most important outcome is, that in all conditions the latching sequence is postponed until the winner side charges up to turn on the corresponding current mirror. In some approaches more than one signal is required to determine the time period of different sequences (resetting, evaluating and latching) [1,[3][4][5][6]. Meanwhile in this structure there is no need for an additional controlling signal to determine the start and stop time of the evaluation period.…”
Section: Proposed Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As an example, a 7-bit flash ADC which contains 2 7 -1 high speed comparators [14] that are designed for 1G comparison per second with required accuracy and minimum power consumption of 96.2 mW in ''TT'' is assumed. Process variation does deteriorate the comparators performance mainly and consequently the whole ADC.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%