2009
DOI: 10.1159/000200093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 1q44 deletion, paternal UPD of chromosome 2 and a deletion due to a complex translocation detected in children with abnormal phenotypes using new SNP array technology

Abstract: Children with intellectual disability, dysmorphic features, malformations and/or growth abnormalities frequently display normal karyotypes. Recent studies have shown that genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays can be effective in detecting abnormalities involving copy number variation (CNV), deletions, duplications and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) that routine cytogenetic tests fail to identify. Five patients with various degrees of intellectual disability and/or dysmorphic features and other … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, our patient shows an overlapping phenotypic spectrum with the reports of the last category [42,43]. However, the family of our patient is consanguineous and his two siblings, in whom UPD (2) pat is excluded, present with partly overlapping phenotypic features (compare Supplementary Appendix).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Notably, our patient shows an overlapping phenotypic spectrum with the reports of the last category [42,43]. However, the family of our patient is consanguineous and his two siblings, in whom UPD (2) pat is excluded, present with partly overlapping phenotypic features (compare Supplementary Appendix).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Chromosomal microarray revealed UPD2 which could lead to her phenotype through three primary mechanisms: imprinting, homozygous CNVs, or unmasking of rare pathogenic sequence variants. There are 19 cases of UPD2 reported in the literature (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Importantly, cases of both maternal and paternal UPD2 have been reported in individuals with normal phenotypes, suggesting that imprinting is an unlikely mechanism by which UPD is causing this patient's phenotype (15,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ). Actually, using next-generation sequencing technology, many UPD cases had previously been detected by whole exome sequencing and WGS [Talseth-Palmer et al, 2009;Keller et al, 2010;Carmichael et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2015]. We demonstrated that the mismatch of STRs between a child and the parents is not always caused by nonrelated parents.…”
Section: Function Prediction Of the Variantsmentioning
confidence: 79%