2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9627-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 21 CFR Part 11 Compliant Graphically Based Electronic System for Clinical Research Documentation

Abstract: Clinical research protocols are intricate and detailed. Regulatory authorities including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration require full documentation of all procedures, including who performed them and when they were performed. Paper based study records are becoming ever more voluminous as the requirements for detailing every item continue to grow. Although the current approach is to transfer required data to electronic databases, each protocol requires uniquely designed databases. Therefore, at present, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of queries can then be implemented in software applications to create a custom interface for the retrieval of data. Previous implementations by this site included a network share with pdf files titled with defined identifiers, allowing the user to find required documents [7]. However, this method required that the user browse a directory system populated with user defined folders to add more identifying information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of queries can then be implemented in software applications to create a custom interface for the retrieval of data. Previous implementations by this site included a network share with pdf files titled with defined identifiers, allowing the user to find required documents [7]. However, this method required that the user browse a directory system populated with user defined folders to add more identifying information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One tool is therefore easily deployed on iPads and laptops, which are our primary computing devices. ConnEDCt’s features, quality, and safety are reliable compared with existing guidelines and requirements, including Good Clinical Data Management Practices [ 8 ], the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [ 9 ], and Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 21 [ 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also developed a test plan based on these specifications to justify validation of the mEDC system. In order to ensure regulatory compliance, we referred to three additional guidelines focusing on EDC systems for RCTs while designing mEDC: Good Clinical Data Management Practices proposed by the Society for Clinical Data Management (SCDM) [10], Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations represented by the Food and Drug Administration [11], and Guidance for Industry Part 11 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations on Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures (21 CFR 11) [12]. Before implementing the primary study, we invited two independent research staff to validate the mEDC system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the study SOP, doctors were required to click a photograph of the page with signatures and submit it to the server, which could help CRAs verify patients’ recruitment because signatures of patients and doctors were essential as per the recommendations of 21 CFR 11 [12]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%