2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/mwsym.2013.6697762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 25-Gbps 8-ps/mm transmission line based interconnect for on-chip communications in multi-core chips

Abstract: This paper presents a novel on-chip interconnect system for multi-core chips using transmission lines as shared media. It supports both point-to-point and broadcasting communications. Compared to network-on-chip approaches, it offers significant advantages in circuit complexity, energy efficiency and link latency. To demonstrate the scheme, a chip prototype with two 20-mm long transmission lines running in parallel and multiple transmitters/receivers (including 2:1 serializer/1:2 deserializer) was implemented … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The state‐of‐the‐art surfaces of these components were used as an upper bound. The surface area occupied by RF NoC is mainly due to the FFT/IFFT [36], the transmitters and receivers [32] and the transmission line [37]. The work of [36] also shows the evolution of the area of two FFTs of 1,024 and 4,096 points as a function of the sampling rate sought.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state‐of‐the‐art surfaces of these components were used as an upper bound. The surface area occupied by RF NoC is mainly due to the FFT/IFFT [36], the transmitters and receivers [32] and the transmission line [37]. The work of [36] also shows the evolution of the area of two FFTs of 1,024 and 4,096 points as a function of the sampling rate sought.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devices at lower technology node having lower supply voltage have better speed and higher energy efficiency for a given architecture. The proposed design has better energy efficiency than the architectures in [25, 26], even though implemented in lower technology node.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%