2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/186780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2D Markerless Gait Analysis Methodology: Validation on Healthy Subjects

Abstract: A 2D markerless technique is proposed to perform lower limb sagittal plane kinematic analysis using a single video camera. A subject-specific, multisegmental model of the lower limb was calibrated with the subject in an upright standing position. Ankle socks and underwear garments were used to track the feet and pelvis segments, whereas shank and thigh segments were tracked by means of reference points identified on the model. The method was validated against a marker based clinical gait model. The accuracy of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
64
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(50 reference statements)
5
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such technology needs to be assessed for validity and reliability in assessing spatiotemporal gait parameters, such as in the current study using a 1-camera method. One other study using a 1-camera system examined the validity between this system and a reference 3-dimensional motion capture system (20). They found differences in accuracy between the 2 systems that were similar compared with the current study for the temporal parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such technology needs to be assessed for validity and reliability in assessing spatiotemporal gait parameters, such as in the current study using a 1-camera method. One other study using a 1-camera system examined the validity between this system and a reference 3-dimensional motion capture system (20). They found differences in accuracy between the 2 systems that were similar compared with the current study for the temporal parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Several low-cost systems exist that use a single-camera setup, footswitches, accelerometers, gyroscopes, and inertial measurement units; however, results on the accuracy of spatial parameters are inconsistent or absent and it is questionable whether some of these systems are reliable in persons with gait deviations (e.g. forefoot contact at initial contact) (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, prior research indicates that sagittal plane motions are less affected due to marker movements and sagittal plane pelvic motions are minimal (<2°) during normal gait. 2, 6 Thus, we believe that the changes observed in this study are much larger than the anticipated errors due to marker movements and kinematic model. Future research should consider incorporating a better kinematic model and 3D camera system to elucidate fully the biomechanical effects of the device on the wearer, particularly when testing patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Along these lines, previous studies have worked on several marker-based and markerless techniques (using a single video camera) to perform quantitative gait analysis [69]. While these approaches simplify experimental setup and typically provide valid and reliable kinematic data [6, 8], they are often limited to off-line analysis of gait kinematics; thus, making it labor intensive during the processing phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these approaches simplify experimental setup and typically provide valid and reliable kinematic data [6, 8], they are often limited to off-line analysis of gait kinematics; thus, making it labor intensive during the processing phase. Further, systems that require manual identification of anatomical landmarks to process kinematic data lack sufficient reliability due to digitization errors [6, 7]. To address these issues, we recently developed a low-cost, real-time motion tracking system for quantitative gait analysis and validated the outcomes using a high-precision robotic gait device [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%