2013
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2012.258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3.42-Approximation Algorithm for Scheduling Malleable Tasks under Precedence Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Offline Scheduling Online Scheduling Independent Tasks Monotonic model : [3,8,26,27,17] Arbitrary model : [29,25,16,17] Comm. model (over time) [15,11,23] Arbitrary model (one-by-one): [33] Task Graphs Roofline model : [31] Monotonic model : [4,19,10,24,20] Roofline model : [31,13] Common models: [5,6,7], [this paper]…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Offline Scheduling Online Scheduling Independent Tasks Monotonic model : [3,8,26,27,17] Arbitrary model : [29,25,16,17] Comm. model (over time) [15,11,23] Arbitrary model (one-by-one): [33] Task Graphs Roofline model : [31] Monotonic model : [4,19,10,24,20] Roofline model : [31,13] Common models: [5,6,7], [this paper]…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When assuming that the area of a job is a concave function of the number of processors, Jansen and Zhang [19] proposed a 3.29-approximation algorithm. Chen and Chu [10] improved the ratio to around 2.95 by further assuming that the execution time of a job is strictly decreasing in the number of allocated processors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations