2008
DOI: 10.1109/lmwc.2008.2002491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3–5 GHz Frequency-Tunable Receiver Frontend for Multiband Applications

Abstract: In this letter, a fully integrated receiver frontend which is composed of a low-noise amplifier and a down-conversion mixer is presented for multiband applications. Different from conventional concurrent or switched-type architectures, the proposed circuit uses varactors for the frequency tuning. In addition, broadband techniques are also employed to maximize the operating frequency range and to enhance the circuit performance. Using a standard 0.18 m CMOS technology, a 3-5 GHz receiver frontend is implemented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intuitive SDR receiver topology is to connect frontends of different standards in parallel as shown in Figure 1(a); nevertheless, the chip size of such topology would be too large. A wideband radio [2][3][4][5][6] and a tunable-band radio [7][8][9] (see Figure 1(b)) are good candidates for this purpose. The most challenging problem is how to design an LNA and a mixer that meet all the requirements in such a wideband from 800 MHz to 6 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intuitive SDR receiver topology is to connect frontends of different standards in parallel as shown in Figure 1(a); nevertheless, the chip size of such topology would be too large. A wideband radio [2][3][4][5][6] and a tunable-band radio [7][8][9] (see Figure 1(b)) are good candidates for this purpose. The most challenging problem is how to design an LNA and a mixer that meet all the requirements in such a wideband from 800 MHz to 6 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the trade-off between noise figure and bandwidth remains an issue. Tunable-band receivers switching its frequency with tunable passive devices [7][8][9] would be promising, except that the size of passive devices is too costly to accept. Designs of mixers can be also challenging for SDR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another tunable design technique is shown in Figure 24 below [21]. This technique simply uses a varactor at the output load to achieve continuous tuning of the output resonance frequencies.…”
Section: Passive Components -Tunablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it can be seen from the almost all the techniques above [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], the L-CS topology is not really suitable for flexibility [25]. Additional circuits are both needed at the input and output individually to achieve proper input matching and output resonance concurrently.…”
Section: Summary Of Flexible Design Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation