2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2015.7178022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3D model for room boundary estimation

Abstract: Estimating the geometric properties of an indoor environment through acoustic room impulse responses (RIRs) is useful in various applications, e.g., source separation, simultaneous localization and mapping, and spatial audio. Previously, we developed an algorithm to estimate the reflector's position by exploiting ellipses as projection of 3D spaces. In this article, we present a model for full 3D reconstruction of environments. More specifically, the three components of the previous method, respectively, MUSIC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1960's, Kac famously lectured about a solution for solving the age-old physics problem of estimating the geometry of a drum based on the sound generated from striking the surface. More recently, this problem has been extended to estimating the shape of rooms based on their acoustic RIR [3,8,11,17,24,30,31,36]. Acoustic geometry reconstruction typically assumes a set of microphones and speaker arrays with known locations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the 1960's, Kac famously lectured about a solution for solving the age-old physics problem of estimating the geometry of a drum based on the sound generated from striking the surface. More recently, this problem has been extended to estimating the shape of rooms based on their acoustic RIR [3,8,11,17,24,30,31,36]. Acoustic geometry reconstruction typically assumes a set of microphones and speaker arrays with known locations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most approaches rely on measuring the RIR and ind the most likely location of walls based on the signals' time of arrival (TOA) [8,11,17,30,31,36] or time diference of arrival (TDOA) [3,24] of impulses, depending on whether the speakers and microphones are synchronized. One approach models walls as planar surfaces tangent to the ellipsoid deined by the distance between transmitter/receiver pairs [3,31]. To ind the overlaps among multiple ellipsoids derived from noisy measurements, most techniques adopt Hough transform or RANSAC to reliably and eiciently ind the best solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the reflector search was computationally expensive, caused mainly by the optimization of its cost function. In our previous work [36], a full 3D method was proposed, exploiting direct reconstruction through ellipsoids. The reflector search was performed utilizing two variants, either the random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm [37], or the combination of the cost function used in [29] and the Hough transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• a multichannel version of DYPSA [32], i.e. clustered DYPSA (C-DYPSA), to automatically extract reflection TOAs from compact microphone array RIRs; • the image-source reversion method ISDAR-LIB, created by the fusion of our ISDAR (the image-source locator presented in [30]) and loudspeaker-image bisection (LIB) (a reflector localization algorithm in [24], [25]); • two further novel variants of ISDAR-LIB, exploiting multiple loudspeakers; • ellipsoid tangent sample consensus (ETSAC), a direct localization method (modified from [36], by utilizing the new C-DYPSA instead of DYPSA); • a comparative evaluation of the state-of-the-art and the proposed methods, using synthetic and measured RIRs. The comprehensive comparison presented here is, to our knowledge, the first that compares image-source reversion and direct localization methods, as approaches for 3D reflector localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%