A 3D-Printed Biomaterial Scaffold Reinforced with Inorganic Fillers for Bone Tissue Engineering: In Vitro Assessment and In Vivo Animal Studies

Abstract

This research aimed to substantiate the potential practicality of utilizing a matrix-like platform, a novel 3D-printed biomaterial scaffold, to enhance and guide host cells’ growth for bone tissue regeneration. The 3D biomaterial scaffold was successfully printed using a 3D Bioplotter® (EnvisionTEC, GmBH) and characterized. Osteoblast-like MG63 cells were utilized to culture the novel printed scaffold over a period of 1, 3, and 7 days. Cell adhesion and surface morphology were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical microscopy, while cell viability was determined using MTS assay and cell proliferation was evaluated using a Leica microsystem (Leica MZ10 F). The 3D-printed biomaterial scaffold exhibited essential biomineral trace elements that are significant for biological bone (e.g., Ca-P) and were confirmed through energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. The microscopy analyses revealed that the osteoblast-like MG63 cells were attached to the printed scaffold surface. The viability of cultured cells on the control and printed scaffold increased over time (p < 0.05); however, on respective days (1, 3, and 7 days), the viability of cultured cells between the two groups was not significantly different (p > 0.05). The protein (human BMP-7, also known as growth factor) was successfully attached to the surface of the 3D-printed biomaterial scaffold as an initiator of osteogenesis in the site of the induced bone defect. An in vivo study was conducted to substantiate if the novel printed scaffold properties were engineered adequately to mimic the bone regeneration cascade using an induced rabbit critical-sized nasal bone defect. The novel printed scaffold provided a potential pro-regenerative platform, rich in mechanical, topographical, and biological cues to guide and activate host cells toward functional regeneration. The histological studies revealed that there was progress in new bone formation, especially at week 8 of the study, in all induced bone defects. In conclusion, the protein (human BMP-7)-embedded scaffolds showed higher regenerative bone formation potential (week 8 complete) compared to the scaffolds without protein (e.g., growth factor; BMP-7) and the control (empty defect). At 8 weeks postimplantation, protein (BMP-7) significantly promoted osteogenesis as compared to other groups. The scaffold underwent gradual degradation and replacement by new bones at 8 weeks in most defects.

Dual carbon sequestration with photosynthetic living materials

“…Comparable results were obtained for the Young’s moduli (E) of the samples using tensile tests of cast samples (Figure S10) . We associated the increase in modulus with the formation of reinforcing inorganic precipitates 45 , though increases in biomass could also contribute to the change in Young’s moduli 46,47 . A similar trend was observed for the material toughness.…”

Literature Review of an Anterior Deprogrammer to Determine the Centric Relation and Presentation of Cases

“…Dental materials must be biocompatible, especially when they will be in close contact with tissues for extended periods of time. Technical testing is utilized to evaluate a material's biocompatibility and guarantee that it is safe for human usage [42,43]. Dental LT Clear is tested at NAMSA, Chasse sur Rhône, in France, and is certified biocompatible per EN-ISO 10993-1:2009/AC:2010.…”

“…The printer has a build volume of 145 × 145 × 185 mm 3B offers high accuracy with a layer thickness ranging from 25 to 300 microns, pro detailed and precise parts. The main reason we used the Form 3B printer is becaus ability to produce a range of biocompatible dental materials formulated explicitly f tal applications, including surgical guides, splints, models, and more [43].…”

Structures, Properties, and Bioengineering Applications of Alginates and Hyaluronic Acid

“…Although natural polymers such as alginate and hyaluronic acid have been used in biomedicine for thousands of years, they still have limitations as single materials. The high hydrophilicity of hyaluronic acid makes it difficult to directly combine it with hydrophobic drugs; alginate hydrogels exhibit poor mechanical properties and, due to their inertness, alginates do not provide binding sites for cells [65]. However, numerous studies on natural biopolymers in recent decades have found that composites based on alginate and hyaluronic acid could make them more attractive biomaterials.…”