2012
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2011.560118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A- and D-optimal progressive Type-II censoring designs based on Fisher information

Abstract: Fisher information about multiple parameters in a progressively Type-II censored sample is discussed. A representation of the Fisher information matrix in terms of the hazard rate of the baseline distribution is established which can be used for efficient computation of the Fisher information. This expression generalizes a result of Zheng and Park [On the Fisher information in multiply censored and progressively censored data, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 33 (2004), pp. 1821-1835 for Fisher information about … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The A-optimality criterion uses the sum of variances of the estimated model parameters as utility function ψ, whereas the D-optimality criterion uses an overall measure of variability given by the determinant of the covariance matrix of the estimated model parameters (see Liski et al 2002). Ng et al (2004), Balakrishnan et al (2008) and Dahmen et al (2012) considered A-and D-optimal criteria for Weibull, Lomax, normal and extreme value distributions in the context of Type-II progressive censoring scheme. Instead of using traditional A-and D-optimal criteria, Kundu (2009, 2013) considered an optimality criterion based on estimated pth quantile of the distribution of lifetime T .…”
Section: Cost Minimization-based Optimum Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The A-optimality criterion uses the sum of variances of the estimated model parameters as utility function ψ, whereas the D-optimality criterion uses an overall measure of variability given by the determinant of the covariance matrix of the estimated model parameters (see Liski et al 2002). Ng et al (2004), Balakrishnan et al (2008) and Dahmen et al (2012) considered A-and D-optimal criteria for Weibull, Lomax, normal and extreme value distributions in the context of Type-II progressive censoring scheme. Instead of using traditional A-and D-optimal criteria, Kundu (2009, 2013) considered an optimality criterion based on estimated pth quantile of the distribution of lifetime T .…”
Section: Cost Minimization-based Optimum Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding Fisher information matrix for vector parameter θ is given by Dahmen et al (2012) gave a direct computation formula for Fisher information matrix as…”
Section: Progressively Censored Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[S2] Fix (n 1 , n 2 , n 3 , n 4 ) = (0, 10, 10, 0), (3,7,7,3), (5,5,5,5), (6,4,4,6) and (10, 0, 0, 10) for N = 20; (n 1 , n 2 , n 3 , n 4 ) = (0, 20, 20, 0), (5,15,15,5), (8,12,12,8), (10, 10, 10, 10), (15,5,5,15) and ( …”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%