Centrality, which quantifies the importance of individual nodes, is among the most essential concepts in modern network theory. As there are many ways in which a node can be important, many different centrality measures are in use. Here, we concentrate on versions of the common betweenness and closeness centralities. The former measures the fraction of paths between pairs of nodes that go through a given node, while the latter measures an average inverse distance between a particular node and all other nodes. Both centralities only consider shortest paths (i.e., geodesics) between pairs of nodes. Here we develop a method, based on absorbing Markov chains, that enables us to continuously interpolate both of these centrality measures away from the geodesic limit and toward a limit where no restriction is placed on the length of the paths the walkers can explore. At this second limit, the interpolated betweenness and closeness centralities reduce, respectively, to the well-known current betweenness and resistance closeness (information)centralities. The method is tested numerically on four real networks, revealing complex changes in node centrality rankings with respect to the value of the interpolation parameter. Non-monotonic betweenness behaviors are found to characterize nodes that lie close to inter-community boundaries in the studied networks.ity's preference for geodesics. However, these do not precisely reduce to the betweenness. Kivimäki et al . [45,46] introduce the randomized-shortest-path (RSP) framework, which assigns Boltzmann weights to all paths in the network. Their inverse temperature parameter also tunes the preference for geodesics. In [45], RSP is used to interpolate between graph distance and resistance distance, while in [46] it is used to interpolate between random-walk betweenness and a measure similar to standard betweenness centrality. In [47], Bavaud and Guex accomplish a weighting equivalent to RSP through the minimization of a free-energy functional. Françoisse et al . also reach similar results with a different path-weighting scheme in [48]. Estrada, Higham, and Hatano [25] calculate a version of betweenness centrality by assigning lower weights to longer paths.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II A, we introduce notations and conventions. In Sec. II B, we discuss well-known centrality measures. In Sec. II C, we develop two new parametrized centralities, based on a specific absorbing random walk, that interpolate between (a) closeness and resistance-closeness centralities and (b) betweenness and random-walk betweenness centralities. In Sec. III A, we report the behavior of these centralities on four example networks. In Sec. III B, we use the numerical examples to explain how the presence of similarly-long paths leads to specific centrality behaviors. In Sec. III C, we provide a model for the non-monotonicity encountered in some of the numerics. In