2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.smhl.2020.100116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bag-of-words feature engineering approach for assessing health conditions using accelerometer data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nine studies included participants with PD of varying disease severity. 10 , 26 , 30 , 34 , 35 , 40 , 42 44 One study compared PD patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) which is an atypical Parkinsonian disorder that clinically shares certain features with PD. 34 This poses the potential for misdiagnosis of PD in PSP patients, therefore the use of the AI model with gait analysis has a role in supplementing the clinical diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nine studies included participants with PD of varying disease severity. 10 , 26 , 30 , 34 , 35 , 40 , 42 44 One study compared PD patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) which is an atypical Parkinsonian disorder that clinically shares certain features with PD. 34 This poses the potential for misdiagnosis of PD in PSP patients, therefore the use of the AI model with gait analysis has a role in supplementing the clinical diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 49 This is known as the ‘bias’ of the model. Five studies applied leave-one-out cross-validation model; 35 , 38 , 39 , 42 , 46 Three studies applied 10-fold cross-validation model. 34 , 43 , 44 It is difficult to determine which method is the most suitable validation tool, as the results can be subjected to multiple confounding variables in the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first problem that will be discussed is PD diagnosis or equivalently the classification between PD patients and healthy controls, which is frequently addressed based on inertial signals. To this end, gait parameters have been extracted either manually via feature engineering techniques [49][50][51][52][53] or automatically via deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [54], to feed several classification algorithms. The deployed algorithms include support vector machines (SVMs), decision trees (DTs), random (RFs), bagged, boosted and fine trees, k-nearest neighbors (kNN), logistic regression (LR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and naïve Bayes (NB) classifiers, as well as multi-layered perceptrons (MLPs) or other neural networks (NNs).…”
Section: Inertial Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that when IMUs are attached to the feet, researchers achieve slightly higher performance than when sensors are attached to the waist or to the lower spine. For example, in [49,51,53], PD diagnosis is performed with 90-99.33% accuracy by a DT, an MLP and an RF classifier, respectively, trained on feet signals, while 84.5-85.51% accuracy is obtained when kNN algorithms are trained over waist signals [50,52]. Moreover, the performance does not seem to improve significantly when deep CNNs are deployed in [54], leading to 0.87 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).…”
Section: Inertial Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works use Discrete wavelet transforms to segment the data [14] and split the input signal into approximations. One of the most perpetual approaches to face annotation scarcity in HAR is sliding windows [15][16] [17]. A small sliding window can discard crucial information, while larger ones can contain action transactions.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%