2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A battery of olfactory-based screens for phenotyping the social and sexual behaviors of mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As known previously (31), WT females were more attracted by pheromones present in the genital areas of the opposite sex than by those from the same sex: when given a choice between adult male genital excretion and estrous female genital excretion smeared on two sides of a slide, more Lmx1b +/+ and Lmx1b +/− females sniffed genital odor from males longer than from that of estrous females ( Fig. 2A), whereas a significantly lower percentage of Lmx1b −/− females sniffed male genital odor longer than female genital odor ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As known previously (31), WT females were more attracted by pheromones present in the genital areas of the opposite sex than by those from the same sex: when given a choice between adult male genital excretion and estrous female genital excretion smeared on two sides of a slide, more Lmx1b +/+ and Lmx1b +/− females sniffed genital odor from males longer than from that of estrous females ( Fig. 2A), whereas a significantly lower percentage of Lmx1b −/− females sniffed male genital odor longer than female genital odor ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Findings on habituation of scent marking to a familiar conspecific add to a body of findings (Arakawa et al, 2007(Arakawa et al, , 2008 suggesting that scent marking in mice may provide a useful model for research on the physiology and pathology of communication in this species, complementary to mouse social recognition paradigms (Crawley et al, 1997;Crawley, 2004;Moy et al, 2004Moy et al, , 2007 that have been used for a variety of models associated with neurocognitive disorders including autism (Qiu et al, 2006;Tueting et al, 2006), Fragile  syndrome (Mineur et al, 2006;Spencer et al, 2005), and Rett syndrome (Moretti et al, 2005;Shahbazian et al, 2002) (cf. Ferkin andLi, 2005). Present findings that conditioned or unconditioned emotional responses to predator odors are capable of reducing initial scent-mark signaling (i.e., scent marking in the absence of conspecific scent) additionally suggest the potential use of this paradigm as a probe to assay motivations associated with scent marking behaviors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The present study demonstrated that C57 as well as CD-1 mice display good social recognition as indexed by scent marking behavior. As olfaction is the primary sensory modality of mice, and mice use scent marks to communicate with conspecifics [12,19,45], scent marking may provide a particularly relevant situation for evaluation of social communication in mice, including specific behaviors that may be responsive to factors related to social psychopathologies [8,23]. The total number of urine marked squares for (a) C57 males exposed to CD-1 males (experiment 1); (b) CD-1 males exposed to CD-1 or a C57 male (experiment 2); (c) CD-1 males exposed to CD-1 males (experiment 2); and (d) C57 males (experiment 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%