Current Trends in Bayesian Methodology With Applications 2015
DOI: 10.1201/b18502-27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Uncertainty Analysis for Nonignorable Nonresponse

Abstract: The discrete time general state-space model is a flexible framework to deal with the nonlinear and/or non-Gaussian time series problems. However, the associated (Bayesian) inference problems are often intractable. Additionally, for many applications of interest, the inference solutions are required to be recursive over time. The particle filter (PF) is a popular class of Monte Carlo based numerical methods to deal with such problems in real time. However, PF is known to be computationally expensive and does no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that Model 2 is not a special case of Model 1: The difference lies in the linear dynamics (4b) that depend on x n t rather than x n t−1 , while yt depends on the current state xt in both models. Also note that for Model 2, the state dynamics for x n t are sometimes given in terms of the transition density x n t ∼ p(x n t | x n t−1 ) (see [32]). Here, the functional form is chosen since it will simplify the derivations later on.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that Model 2 is not a special case of Model 1: The difference lies in the linear dynamics (4b) that depend on x n t rather than x n t−1 , while yt depends on the current state xt in both models. Also note that for Model 2, the state dynamics for x n t are sometimes given in terms of the transition density x n t ∼ p(x n t | x n t−1 ) (see [32]). Here, the functional form is chosen since it will simplify the derivations later on.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Regular prediction: (31) • Posterior linearization prediction: (26) and (32) Furthermore, the conditional variablesx l t andP l t are again calculated as in (11). From SLR, Φt, Γt, and Σν t are given by…”
Section: Measurement Updatementioning
confidence: 99%