2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12053-017-9581-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A behavioral change-based approach to energy efficiency in a manufacturing plant

Abstract: In the realm of industrial energy efficiency studies, very little research has been done to understand the barriers and opportunities to influence behavior of production workers and the corresponding energysaving potentials. This paper analyzes a case study of Volvo Construction Equipment AB in Braås, Sweden (VCE Braås), that has reduced its relative idle electricity use by more than 10 percentage points during 2013-2016 by implementing a strategy of changing everyday behavior of production workers. The result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows that employees' behaviour actions cause energy efficiency results. Their motivation initiated their actions [33]. Energy efficiency behaviour also can be affected by increasing knowledge, abilities, skills, and attitude of energy consumers towards energy usage to reduce energy consumption [34].…”
Section: Conceptual Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows that employees' behaviour actions cause energy efficiency results. Their motivation initiated their actions [33]. Energy efficiency behaviour also can be affected by increasing knowledge, abilities, skills, and attitude of energy consumers towards energy usage to reduce energy consumption [34].…”
Section: Conceptual Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many factors identified as significant drivers or barriers by vast literature that studied energy efficiency behaviour. They are: “change aversion or status-quo bias” (Jabbour et al , 2016; Kahneman et al , 2018; Samuelson and Zeckhauser, 1988), “values” (Faiers et al , 2007; Palm and Thollander, 2010; Rahman and Reynolds, 2019; Stern et al , 1999), “socialization” (Furedi, 2009; Thøgersen and Grønhøj, 2010; Tyagi et al , 2015), “habit” (Dahlbom et al , 2009; Lo et al , 2014; Mansor, 2017), “proactiveness” (Cagno and Trianni, 2014; Jabbour et al , 2016; Meinherz, 2018), “leadership” (Doris et al , 2009; Mahapatra et al , 2018), “energy policy” (Allcott et al , 2014; Schleich et al , 2009; Stenqvist and Nilsson, 2012), “incentive schemes” (Gillingham et al , 2006; Romankiewicz et al , 2012; Shi et al , 2008), “delegation of power” (Munro, 2012; Thollander and Palm, 2013), “life cycle cost-purchase policy” (Marchi and Zanoni, 2017; Pauliuk et al , 2017), “suggestion schemes” (Thollander and Palm, 2013) and “budget allocation” (Hepbasli and Ozalp, 2003; Rohdin et al , 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johansson (2015) states that the organizational implementation of the energy management process is crucial, especially in terms of power of the energy manager and for lowering informational barriers. Mahapatra et al (2018) highlight the powerful effect of behavioural changes in the work force in heavy industry. Lawrence et al (2019) identify organizational effects in firms as most hindering barriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%