2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-01972-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmark of algorithms for the analysis of pooled CRISPR screens

Abstract: Genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas-mediated knockout, activation, and repression screens are powerful tools for functional genomic investigations. Despite their increasing importance, there is currently little guidance on how to design and analyze CRISPR-pooled screens. Here, we provide a review of the commonly used algorithms in the computational analysis of pooled CRISPR screens. We develop a comprehensive simulation framework to benchmark and compare the performance of these algorithms using both synthetic and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also simulated data using a tool recently developed by Bodapati et al [27]. Using the data from these simulations RELICS again outperformed all other methods in AP, precision, recall and BP accuracy (see methods, S4 Fig).…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We also simulated data using a tool recently developed by Bodapati et al [27]. Using the data from these simulations RELICS again outperformed all other methods in AP, precision, recall and BP accuracy (see methods, S4 Fig).…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The P -values are determined by the RSA algorithm for the genes that are most enriched in the PARP14-knockout condition compared to the wildtype condition. Separately from the RSA analyses, we also analyzed the screen results using MAGeCK, which takes into consideration raw gRNA read counts to test if individual guides vary significantly between the conditions ( 36 , 37 ). The MAGeCK software and instructions on running it were obtained from https://sourceforge.net/p/mageck/wiki/libraries/ .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They try to address those issues that still influence them, such as the variability in guide RNA efficiency, variation in gene effect size and false-positive rate due to cell death from excessive cutting in high copy number regions [6,[54][55][56][57][58]. These algorithms include BAGEL [59], CERES [6], CRISPhieRmix [56], CRISPRcleanR [57], HiTSelect [60], JACKS [61], MAGeCK MLE [54], MAGeCK RRA [62] and RSA [63], that showed good performance according to the different experimental settings used [64].…”
Section: Dropout Screening Approaches To Dissect Gene Vulnerabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%