A Bibliometric Review of Institutional Theory on Higher Education Institutions

Hsu, Pang Lien; Maccari, Émerson Antônio; Mazieri, Marcos Rogério; Storópoli, José

doi:10.24023/futurejournal/2175-5825/2018.v10i3.384

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 63 publications

(57 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Institutional Logics and Logic Multiplicity In Higher Educat...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The subject of institutional logics seems to be of particular interest, especially in relation to complex organisations, where the multiplicity of often contradictory logics is a permanent feature of these organisations. Researchers agree that universities and in general all Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) represent a heterogeneous and interdisciplinary research object (Hsu et al, 2018). This is because they consist of diverse founding structures, forms of ownership, specialisation and size, activities, quality and finally, their organisational and functional units (Lockett et al, 2008;Paradeise and Thoenig, 2013), which are managed at different levels (Goodall, 2009;Banae Costa and Oliveira, 2012), and are made up of very diverse groups of actors (Gassol, 2007;Alves et al, 2010) who have different and often conflicting interests vis-a-vis the organisation.…”

Section: Institutional Logics and Logic Multiplicity In Higher Educat...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Conflicting or co-existing logics – doing action research within the framework of a project in a university

Jałocha

Bogacz-Wojtanowska²,

Góral³

et al. 2022

IJMPB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe aim of the study was to illustrate how three different institutional logics, present in the implementation of action research, interact in a formalised project, in a traditional university setting.Design/methodology/approachThe article is empirical in nature and the research method used is an instrumental case study. The case was the implementation of action research within the framework of an educational project co-financed by EU funds, conducted in a Polish public university. The research process was conducted from September 2017 to November 2019. The following techniques were used: document analysis, in-depth interviews, participatory observation during the project. Constant comparative analysis was used as an analytical approach.FindingsThe study indicates that action research, project management and university management follow different “logics”. The dominant logic of action research is problem-solving, of project management is efficiency and of university management is compliance. These different logics and the relationship between them is explained in the paper.Originality/valueThe research enriches the ongoing discussion on logic multiplicity and project management in a new context – that of the university environment and combines the issue of the implementation of action research with broader conversations on institutional logics.

show abstract

Section: Institutional Logics and Logic Multiplicity In Higher Educat...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Institutional Logics and Logic Multiplicity In Higher Educat...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Conflicting or co-existing logics – doing action research within the framework of a project in a university

Jałocha

Bogacz-Wojtanowska²,

Góral³

et al. 2022

IJMPB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Effectively measuring impact is essential (Hsu et al, 2018). Besides that, the industry requires new knowledge, so collaboration between universities and businesses will result in a network that enhances innovation.…”

Section: Higher Education Innovation Creationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the role of measuring impact in higher education innovation creation

Prihandono

Wijaya

Wiratama

et al. 2022

JARHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study responds to the need for further research to examine determinants that impact innovation creation in higher education institutions.Design/methodology/approachThe study is a quantitative analysis; it uses 133 responses derived from respondents from several universities in Indonesia. The data are analyzed by using SEM-PLS. In the analysis, after having the inner model, then, the outer model is calculated. The research establishes a 95% confidence interval and conducts 500 bootstraps.FindingsThe results of this study indicate, firstly, the business and university partnerships, entrepreneurship orientation, and information technology facilities significantly influence innovation creation; secondly, measuring the impact in universities will strengthen the business and university partnerships, entrepreneurship orientation, and information technology facilities on the innovation creation.Research limitations/implicationsThis research implies that universities need to measure the impact and develop a proper measurement to enhance innovation through their relationship with their industrial partnerships and information technology facilities. However, the research has a limitation; the study is only conducted in state universities.Practical implicationsThe research measures the impact of the university–business partnership, entrepreneurship orientation, and IT facility. These determinants' effectiveness needs a measurement scheme to improve the innovation creation outputs, quantity, and quality.Originality/valueUniversities have an essential role in developing entrepreneurship competence for students and staff by nurturing innovation creation. It will benefit the staff in managing tasks and the students after they graduate to create businesses. This study aims to provide an in-depth analysis of determinants that affect innovation creation in higher education institutions in Indonesia.

show abstract

“…In the face of anti-COVID-19 policies, university governance suggests the hybrid model as a preventive protocol before the immunization of professors, administrators, and students (Rahman, 2021). In contrast, the institutionalist model that supposes the implementation of anti-COVID-19 public policies based on the epidemiological traffic light (Hsu et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploratory model of institutionalism in the COVD-19 era

Lirios¹

2022

IJRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Institutionalism has been studied from an isomorphic approach, which supposes the reflection of state policies in institutional procedures, as would be the case of flexibility (intensive division of labor), informality (runaway job protection) and multilateralism (process synchronization). The objective of this article was to specify a model for the study of the phenomenon, by establishing the reliability and validity that measures three of the dimensions in question. A non-experimental study was carried out with a non-probabilistic selection of 100 teachers, administrators and students from a public university in central Mexico subject to certification processes. From a structural model it was found that flexibility was established as the reflecting factor of the new institutionalism construct, recommending the contrast of the construct that was explained by three factors up to of its variance.

show abstract

A Bibliometric Review of Institutional Theory on Higher Education Institutions

Cited by 5 publications

References 63 publications

Conflicting or co-existing logics – doing action research within the framework of a project in a university

Conflicting or co-existing logics – doing action research within the framework of a project in a university

Examining the role of measuring impact in higher education innovation creation

Exploratory model of institutionalism in the COVD-19 era

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About