Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International on-Line Testing Workshop (IOLTW 2002)
DOI: 10.1109/olt.2002.1030190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A BICS for CMOS opamps by monitoring the supply current peak

Abstract: We present a Built-In-Current-Sensor (BICS) based on monitoring the supply current peak of CMOS opamps using the oscillation-test-strategy. The BICS takes a weighed sample of the current through each opamp current branch and monitors the peak value under oscillation. An envelope detector and additional digital circuitry is used to provide a pass/fail flag. Simulation results demonstrate a high defect coverage with a very small impact on the opamp nominal operation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…techniques [1][2][3], commonly referred to as IDDQ current sensors, are relatively simple as no test stimulus block A is required, and suitable for detecting bridging faults. However, a Circuit-Under-Test (CUT) may suffer from power supply variations caused by a shunt resistive component connected between the CUT and power supply (or ground), and inappropriate setting of reference currents may also affect the precision of fault detection owing to a broad range of faulty currents [4].…”
Section: Existing On-chip Testing Tech-niques and System Implementa-t...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…techniques [1][2][3], commonly referred to as IDDQ current sensors, are relatively simple as no test stimulus block A is required, and suitable for detecting bridging faults. However, a Circuit-Under-Test (CUT) may suffer from power supply variations caused by a shunt resistive component connected between the CUT and power supply (or ground), and inappropriate setting of reference currents may also affect the precision of fault detection owing to a broad range of faulty currents [4].…”
Section: Existing On-chip Testing Tech-niques and System Implementa-t...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is Manuscript received on July 14, 2009 ; revised on October 23, 2009. 1,2 The authors are with The Electronic and Photonic System Engineering, Kochi University of Technology (KUT), Tosayamada-Cho, Kami-City, Kochi, 782-8502, Japan. Tel: (+81)-887-57-2212, E-mail: 118002m@gs.kochi-tech.ac.jp and tachibana.masayoshi@kochi-tech.ac.jp a demand for cost-effective test techniques with low testing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observability of the supply current can be easily achieved by measuring the voltage drop. But this method has a shortcoming of impacting the effective supply voltage range seen by the device under test (DUT) and requires precise current sources [4,10]. A built-in self test (BIST) scheme effectively configures the op amp as a voltage follower and a comparator to detect its slew rate deviation and signal propagation delay deviation, respectively [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two major testing techniques are current and voltage sensing techniques. On the one hand, the current sensing technique, commonly referred to as IDDQ and IDDT current sensors [2][3], is relatively simple and suitable for detecting bridging faults. However, a Circuit-Under-Test (CUT) may suffer from power supply variation, and inappropriate setting of reference currents may affect the precision of fault detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%