1996
DOI: 10.2307/1349587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bioeconomic Analysis of Site‐Specific Management for Weed Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since most research has been done in the area of herbicide application (vide supra), the focus of this section lies on the economic impact of VR herbicide application. Oriade et al (1996) [125] suggested that weed patchiness is the most important factor economically justifying the use of site-specific weed control. Using simulation, they showed that economic and environmental benefits are almost zero at low weed pressures, particularly if weeds are evenly spread.…”
Section: Impacts Of the Use Of Vrpa On Productivity And Farm Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most research has been done in the area of herbicide application (vide supra), the focus of this section lies on the economic impact of VR herbicide application. Oriade et al (1996) [125] suggested that weed patchiness is the most important factor economically justifying the use of site-specific weed control. Using simulation, they showed that economic and environmental benefits are almost zero at low weed pressures, particularly if weeds are evenly spread.…”
Section: Impacts Of the Use Of Vrpa On Productivity And Farm Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible result from adoption of SSM is the potential environmental benefits. Several studies suggest that SSM has the potential to reduce chemical runoff and leaching through improved matching of chemical application with crop needs (Hite, Hudson and Intarapapong 2002a;Office of Technology Assessment 1995;Fuglie and Bosch 1995;Khanna and Zilberman 1997;Oriade et al 1996;Schnitkey and Hopkins 1997). Assuming that these environmental impacts are tenable, they create a positive externality (or reduce a negative externality) by reducing pollution levels that accrues to the public, but currently provide little or no added monetary incentive for producers to adopt SSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By modeling the economic consequences of site specific weed control in regard to weed coverage (such as the number of occurring weed varieties, specific density compared to the damage threshold, and weed vegetation phase at the given time), those relations can be revealed which determine whether positive results can be reached in an economic sense, and reveal what the main influencing factors are [21,22].…”
Section: The Role Of Precision Pesticide Management In Precision Planmentioning
confidence: 99%