2010
DOI: 10.1123/jab.26.2.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Biomechanical Assessment of Isometric Handgrip Force and Fatigue at Different Anatomical Positions

Abstract: The present work examined the handgrip force at different anatomical positions for both hands. Anthropometrics, handgrip force, and fatigue were obtained from a representative sample of 20 males randomly selected from the German Jordanian University students. The hand dynamometer first was calibrated with respect to the volunteer's maximal grip strength, and he was then asked to squeeze maximally until the grip force decreased to 50% of its maximal due to fatigue; this test was performed for both hands at diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
19
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are no reference data for badminton players, whose values are higher than those recorded by Alkurdi and Dweiri [44] in 20 German male students (dominant = 300.9±85.1 N, non dominant = 290.3±69.2 N) using the same methodology as in the present study, and lower than those recorded by Ducher et al [45] in 52 tennis players (dominant = 602.7±155.7 N, non dominant = 521.1±128.5 N). These differences may possibly be due to the fact that badminton players use a racket which weighs 3 to 4 times less than a tennis racket (badminton ∼100 g; tennis ∼350 g) so that the grip strength needed by the badminton player to handle the racket will be less than that of the tennis player.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…However, there are no reference data for badminton players, whose values are higher than those recorded by Alkurdi and Dweiri [44] in 20 German male students (dominant = 300.9±85.1 N, non dominant = 290.3±69.2 N) using the same methodology as in the present study, and lower than those recorded by Ducher et al [45] in 52 tennis players (dominant = 602.7±155.7 N, non dominant = 521.1±128.5 N). These differences may possibly be due to the fact that badminton players use a racket which weighs 3 to 4 times less than a tennis racket (badminton ∼100 g; tennis ∼350 g) so that the grip strength needed by the badminton player to handle the racket will be less than that of the tennis player.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Classically, HGS is determined by limited procedures in terms of the number of repetitions (ordinarily, 1-3 repetitions), the highest recorded value of which is taken. Another proposed variant is the determination of the fatigue of the hand during isometric efforts of clamping of the dynamometer in various anatomical positions [32].…”
Section: Applications Of Poincaré Plot In the Analysis Of The Biologimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depois de verificada a normalidade de distribuição dos escores, utilizou-se análise de variância de uma entrada para verificar diferenças entre as médias de força obtidas por diferentes protocolos. Para verificar a concordância entre as medidas utilizou-se análise de concordância pelo método de Bland-Altman (BLAND; ALTMAN, 1999). O nível de significância aceito foi de p<0,05.…”
Section: Análise Estatísticaunclassified