2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A blind MPEG-2 video watermarking robust to camcorder recording

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the human visual system (HVS) more easily perceives changes in luminance than in chrominance [58], the performance was limited by the low watermark magnitude required to maintain the imperceptibility of the watermark. Therefore, when required to maintain watermark imperceptibility, its robustness to attacks was shown to be lower than that of methods where the watermark was embedded in the chrominance channel [59], [60].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, as the human visual system (HVS) more easily perceives changes in luminance than in chrominance [58], the performance was limited by the low watermark magnitude required to maintain the imperceptibility of the watermark. Therefore, when required to maintain watermark imperceptibility, its robustness to attacks was shown to be lower than that of methods where the watermark was embedded in the chrominance channel [59], [60].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Table 1 lists some of the popular video-watermarking schemes. It can be observed that most schemes perform watermark embedding in DWT, DCT, and SVD domains [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Generally, such schemes are computationally complex [28] and unable to recover the lossless watermark image due to shiftvariant property [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the realization of digital watermarking, it can be divided into spatial domain methods [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and transform domain methods [2,[10][11][12][13][14][15]. In the spatial domain, the common methods are histogram based methods [3][4][5], feature based methods [2,7] and pixel modification based methods [6,8,9]. Histogram has good performance in resisting RST (rotation, scaling and translation) attacks because of its shape invariance [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the selected watermark area has less texture, the local quality of the image will have a great drop. Other methods [8,9] embed the watermark by modifying the whole frame in the spatial domain, but they do not consider the content features of the video and the continuity of adjacent frames, which causes visual flicker. Li et al [6] select a fixed number of small blocks to reduce the amount of modified pixels, thereby improving the visual quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%