A blueprint for process‐based modeling of uncertain hydrological systems

Abstract

We present a probability based theoretical scheme for building process‐based models of uncertain hydrological systems, thereby unifying hydrological modeling and uncertainty assessment. Uncertainty for the model output is assessed by estimating the related probability distribution via simulation, thus shifting from one to many applications of the selected hydrological model. Each simulation is performed after stochastically perturbing input data, parameters and model output, this latter by adding random outcomes from the population of the model error, whose probability distribution is conditioned on input data and model parameters. Within this view randomness, and therefore uncertainty, is treated as an inherent property of hydrological systems. We discuss the related assumptions as well as the open research questions. The theoretical framework is illustrated by presenting real‐world and synthetic applications. The relevant contribution of this study is related to proposing a statistically consistent simulation framework for uncertainty estimation which does not require model likelihood computation and simplification of the model structure. The results show that uncertainty is satisfactorily estimated although the impact of the assumptions could be significant in conditions of data scarcity.

Developing predictive insight into changing water systems: use-inspired hydrologic science for the Anthropocene

“…Most current diagnostic efforts rely on evaluation of flow time series (Maurer et al, 2007;Moss, 1979a, b), which represent only a small component of the information within a model. New metrics are needed that can evaluate the ability of models to represent non-stationary water systems (Laio and Tamea, 2007;Montanari and Koutsoyiannis, 2012;Sikorska et al, 2013). Finally, observations will be essential to identify the presence of events and trends that were not predicted.…”

Improving Flood Prediction Assimilating Uncertain Crowdsourced Data into Hydrological and Hydraulic Models

“…Uncertainty can be due to either the inherent stochastic nature and variability of hydrological processes, i.e. aleatory uncertainty Montanari and Koutsoyiannis, 2012), or to our imperfect state of knowledge of the hydrological system and our limited ability to model it, i.e. epistemic uncertainty (Merz and Thieken, 2005;Hall and Solomatine, 2008;Domeneghetti et al, 2013).…”

A guide to good practice in modeling semantics for authors and referees

“…For instance, we might have a source of uncertainty that appears to be aleatory and therefore, appropriately represented in probabilistic terms, but it might not be clear as to whether we are using the correct probabilistic model (at base, a distribution or joint distribution, together with any consistent bias or correlation structure). Techniques have been developed (e.g., the metaGaussian transform, or copula methods) to try to convert apparently complex series of errors into simple distributional forms for which the theory is well developed (in particular, multivariate Gaussian forms) [e.g., Montanari and Koutsoyiannis, 2012]. But there might then be epistemic uncertainty about the choice of distributional form or transform (e.g., the choice of a particular distribution or copula).…”