2009
DOI: 10.4038/gmj.v13i1.896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brain death: concepts and confusions among medical experts, legal authorities and general public in Sri Lanka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Sri Lankan law does not identify the persistent vegetative state as a specific entity and medical professionals treat the person as in a deeply comatose state. 30 In…”
Section: Brain Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Sri Lankan law does not identify the persistent vegetative state as a specific entity and medical professionals treat the person as in a deeply comatose state. 30 In…”
Section: Brain Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Act does not stipulate what the exact criteria should be. 28 Currently, brain death is certified when repeated clinical examinations by two doctors 12 hours apart show absence of brainstem function. The PaCO 2 threshold for the apnea test is not specified.…”
Section: Sri Lankamentioning
confidence: 99%