2011
DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.103215ac
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brief history of angiogenesis assays

Abstract: The major problem with angiogenesis research is the choice of an appropriate assay. Currently, many in vitro and in vivo techniques are available for research into the functions of endothelial cells during angiogenesis. In this historical review article, we describe and evaluate the methodology and specific features of some of the most frequently used of these assays.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the in vitro assays, the three most used include rabbit cornea (Muthukkaruppan and Auerbach, 1979), the developing mouse retina (Fruttiger, 2007), and the intersegmental vessel growth in zebrafish (Lawson and Weinstein, 2002). In vitro models with isolated endothelial cell lines have allowed to study selected aspects of the angiogenic process, including endothelial migration, proliferation, proteolytic digestion of the extracellular matrix and capillary tube formation (Cimpean et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the in vitro assays, the three most used include rabbit cornea (Muthukkaruppan and Auerbach, 1979), the developing mouse retina (Fruttiger, 2007), and the intersegmental vessel growth in zebrafish (Lawson and Weinstein, 2002). In vitro models with isolated endothelial cell lines have allowed to study selected aspects of the angiogenic process, including endothelial migration, proliferation, proteolytic digestion of the extracellular matrix and capillary tube formation (Cimpean et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One well‐established in vitro model for angiogenesis is the network‐forming properties of ECs on growth factor‐reduced Matrigel or similar laminin‐rich substrates: the cord‐forming assay as it was implemented in the present work allowed a complete description of EC networks formed within an entire well. Other in vitro angiogenesis models required the manual selection of imaging areas (three‐dimensional tubule assay), leading to possible experimental bias, or assayed the response of physiologically irrelevant (fetal‐ or aortic‐) endothelial cells (Cimpean et al , ). Endothelial cell cord networks are extremely dynamic, maintaining highly‐branched multicellular configurations under the influence of pro‐angiogenic factors and regressing to relatively inert cell clusters within a few hours following the removal of pro‐angiogenic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assays confirming different aspects of reperfusion activity of CTPs can be based on existing or novel in vitro tests such as cell paracrine mechanisms, cell multiplication and proliferation, cell migration, cell differentiation or tube formation (TF) or on in vivo angiogenesis tests such as matrigel plug assay or corneal angiogenesis assay [16].…”
Section: Considerations In the Development Of Multimodal Potency Assamentioning
confidence: 99%