2010
DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e3181f0bd93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Brief Retrospective Report on the Feasibility of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and KRAS Mutation Analysis in Transesophageal Ultrasound- and Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Cytological Aspirates

Abstract: Molecular analysis for KRAS and EGFR mutations can be performed routinely in cytologic specimens from EUS- and EBUS-guided FNA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have investigated whether samples obtained during EBUS-TBNA are sufficient for molecular analysis and have demonstrated high, although variable, adequacy rates (77.7-98.7%) (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). These studies were heterogeneous in terms of cytohistopathological techniques and sample size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated whether samples obtained during EBUS-TBNA are sufficient for molecular analysis and have demonstrated high, although variable, adequacy rates (77.7-98.7%) (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). These studies were heterogeneous in terms of cytohistopathological techniques and sample size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One concern, however, is that there may be less tissue in an EBUS sample and that this could be insufficient to perform the required ancillary IHC and molecular testing. Current evidence from other studies suggests that EBUS-transbronchial needles aspiration (TBNA) samples are usually sufficient for molecular genetic testing with diagnostic rates between 72-95.5% (5)(6)(7)(8). Santis et al [2011] had a diagnostic rate of 95.5% with the aid of rapid on site examination (ROSE) (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly assumed that cytology cannot provide enough material to identify these mutations. Yet studies 22,[29][30][31] have demonstrated the utility of routine cytology specimens, such as brushes, washes, lavages, and FNA and EBUS material, as well as pleural and pericardial fluid in identifying mutations ( Table 2). The success rate of cytology material, however, does depend somewhat on the type of specimen.…”
Section: The Emerging Visibility Of the Pathologist And The Cytologismentioning
confidence: 99%