2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40799-020-00414-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Brief Review and Advances of Thermographic Image - Processing Methods for IRT Inspection: a Case of Study on GFRP Plate

Abstract: The present work introduces a different data processing strategy, proposed in order to improve sub-surface defect detection on industrial composites; in addition, a resume of thermal data processing with most common algorithms in literature is presented and applied with new data. A deep comparison between the common absolute contrast, DAC, PCT, TSR and derivative methods and a new proposed contrast mapping procedure is implemented. Thermographic inspection was done in reflection mode on a Glass Fiber Reinforce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Eq. 6, the PCT processing method rearranges the input three-dimensional matrix A to produce EOF and PC images sequences; the first few EOFs here described show large variability in the thermal sequence, as shown in 14a [30]. The analysis of EOF profiles shows an evident data variability of all k n profiles in the case of 5 selected ROI couples, showing alternatively both positive and negative contrast values, maximized generally in the first frames, but identifying defects in optimal way, as the 2nd and 3rd EOFs maps highlight respectively in Fig.…”
Section: Pct and Eof Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As seen in Eq. 6, the PCT processing method rearranges the input three-dimensional matrix A to produce EOF and PC images sequences; the first few EOFs here described show large variability in the thermal sequence, as shown in 14a [30]. The analysis of EOF profiles shows an evident data variability of all k n profiles in the case of 5 selected ROI couples, showing alternatively both positive and negative contrast values, maximized generally in the first frames, but identifying defects in optimal way, as the 2nd and 3rd EOFs maps highlight respectively in Fig.…”
Section: Pct and Eof Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, MATLAB codes are implemented in a Graphical user interface (GUI) for image-processing evaluation of thermal data, comparing relative thermal profiles during time in selected Regions of Interest (ROIs) in most interesting defective and defect-free zones, as showed in other works [30]. The origin of different processing techniques lies in the thermal contrast evaluation [19] and several contrasts definitions have been proposed by different authors, i. e. absolute, normalized, running or standard [19,20], finally differential absolute contrast (DAC) [21] and interpolated differential absolute contrast approach (IDAC) [31].…”
Section: Post-processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wei et al have achieved similar results by the combination of long-pulse thermography and PCA on a GFRP plate modified with flat bottom holes [16]. Panella et al performed a case study on a GFRP plate modified with various flat bottom holes by using long-pulse thermography with halogen lamps as excitation [15]. Different heating times between 5 s and 40 s were applied to the test specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Due to the lateral heat transfer that takes place in the material between the surface and the defect, a defect with a depth-to-diameter ratio of ≥1 is considered to be barely detectable. In most experimental investigations, flat and uncoated reference objects (GFRP and CFRP) modified with flat bottom holes were studied [15][16][17][18] to reduce unfavourable influences on the results due to a curved geometry or a coated surface. Kaminska et al, for example, carried out investigations on a GFRP plate modified with flat bottom holes [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%