2020
DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2020.1781527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brief review concerning the latest advances in the influence of nanoparticle reinforcement into polymeric-matrix biomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCL was selected as the major component of scaffolds because it is easy to process by 3D printing, is biodegradable and biocompatible, and possesses adequate mechanical strength. However, the hydrophobic surface and lack of osteoconductivity of the PCL matrix represents some disadvantages, which can impair cells adhesion and proliferation [42,43]. Therefore, HA incorporation was considered to enhance scaffolds' performance, providing more strength and improving cellular activities, including cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation [17,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCL was selected as the major component of scaffolds because it is easy to process by 3D printing, is biodegradable and biocompatible, and possesses adequate mechanical strength. However, the hydrophobic surface and lack of osteoconductivity of the PCL matrix represents some disadvantages, which can impair cells adhesion and proliferation [42,43]. Therefore, HA incorporation was considered to enhance scaffolds' performance, providing more strength and improving cellular activities, including cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation [17,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoparticles have been utilized in orthodontics, prosthodontics, and restorative dentistry with the objective to improve materials’ mechanical properties and reduce the microbial load adjacent or attached to different types of restorations [ 53 ]. Previous studies confirmed that the incorporation of metaloxide nanoparticles into dental polymers resulted in experimental materials with improved physical, mechanical, biological, and biocompatibility properties, thereby supporting the continued development and characterization of nanofilled materials [ 29 , 54 , 55 ]. However, despite these encouraging findings, recent reports have raised concerns regarding the incorporation of nanoparticles into dental adhesive resins, because nanofilled materials displayed high viscosity and limited ability to flow into dentinal tubules [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Sole PGLA has weak mechanical properties and cell affinity, and it is commonly preferred to be compounded together with a ceramic constituent to form a polymer/ceramic composite scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Consequently, composites with polymer matrices, including biologically active nanoparticles, have gained particular attention in the biomedical field [ 393 , 394 ].…”
Section: Am Of Biomedical Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%