2018
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2018.2864583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Broadband Dipole Antenna With Parasitic Patch Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a simple structure and excellent performance, the magnetoelectric (ME) dipole antenna, designed by Luk and Wong [3], has attracted extensive attention and further research. By adding a parasitic patch above the antenna, a U-shaped folded ME dipole antenna with a wide bandwidth of 72.7% (1.61-3.45 GHz) was proposed in [4]. To realise dual-band capability, ME dipole antennas with different structures have appeared, such as multilayer structure [5][6][7], parasitic patch [8,9], special E-dipole [10,11] etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a simple structure and excellent performance, the magnetoelectric (ME) dipole antenna, designed by Luk and Wong [3], has attracted extensive attention and further research. By adding a parasitic patch above the antenna, a U-shaped folded ME dipole antenna with a wide bandwidth of 72.7% (1.61-3.45 GHz) was proposed in [4]. To realise dual-band capability, ME dipole antennas with different structures have appeared, such as multilayer structure [5][6][7], parasitic patch [8,9], special E-dipole [10,11] etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, in addition to the antenna in, 3 the proposed antenna is also the most compact. The gains of the antennas in 4 and 7‐9 are higher than that of the proposed antenna because of the large radiation aperture. Similarly, a bigger reflector will result in a larger FBR, while the FBR of the proposed antenna is still >10 dB over the entire impedance bandwidth, which is better than the ones in 3,7,8 …”
Section: Antenna Performance and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A comparison between the reported wideband antennas and the proposed antenna is made in Table 3. Due to multilayer substrate and patches used in, 3 folded bowtie dipole, microstrip to stripline transition and cavity used in, 4 and complex electric dipole and parasitic patch used in, 9 the three designs are considered complex in structure. It can be seen from Table 3 that the proposed antenna can obtain the maximum impedance bandwidth under a high standard (VSWR <1.5).…”
Section: Antenna Performance and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…operation, various designs of dipole antennas have been reported, such as modifying the shape of the dipole arms [1]- [3], improving feeding methods [4]- [5], loading parasitic radiators [6]- [8], and employing magnetoelectric complementary structures [9]- [10]. As a typical transformation of the single dipole, the folded dipole antennas (FDAs) are employed in many applications [11]- [14] owing to the wideband impedance characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%