2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2016.2632721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Budget Feasible Incentive Mechanism for Weighted Coverage Maximization in Mobile Crowdsensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, MCS also poses several challenges, including efficient task design and allocation, target participant selection, incentive mechanisms, security and privacy concerns, and ensuring the reliability, trustworthiness, and quality of the collected data. Many of these issues have been addressed in prior research [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. While early MCS studies have focused on a few very common sensor devices, such as GPS traces and accelerometer readings, more recent efforts include many other types of sensor readings, such as physiological data (e.g., heart rate and calorie burn), behavioral data (e.g., sleep habits, battery recharge patterns, and different types of physical activities), social networking data, and systems information, including scans of Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cell radios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MCS also poses several challenges, including efficient task design and allocation, target participant selection, incentive mechanisms, security and privacy concerns, and ensuring the reliability, trustworthiness, and quality of the collected data. Many of these issues have been addressed in prior research [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. While early MCS studies have focused on a few very common sensor devices, such as GPS traces and accelerometer readings, more recent efforts include many other types of sensor readings, such as physiological data (e.g., heart rate and calorie burn), behavioral data (e.g., sleep habits, battery recharge patterns, and different types of physical activities), social networking data, and systems information, including scans of Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cell radios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], the authors considered the user-centric model where each user can ask for reserve price, and designed the truthful and scalable auction mechanism for the CSP to achieve revenue maximization. The authors in [19] addressed how to maximize the valuation of the covered interested regions under limited budget for strategy-proof mobile crowdsensing. In [20], the authors proposed a long-term dynamic incentive mechanism to capture the dynamic nature of long-term data quality of participants, where a truthful, quality-aware and budget feasible algorithm is designed for task allocation with polynomial-time computational complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only difference is that the best-response function update policy in the 4th line of Algorithm 1 is replaced by another update policy obtained from Eq. (19). Since we have validated the existence and uniqueness of the Bayesian Nash equilibrium, the modified Algorithm 1 can achieve the Bayesian Nash equilibrium [49].…”
Section: B Stackelberg Game Equilibrium Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [26], a 'double or nothing' incentivecompatible mechanism is proposed to ensure workers behave honesty based on their self-confidence; this protocol is provable to avoid spammers from the crowd, under the assumption that every worker wants to maximize their expected payment. In [40,39,41,42,44,43], Zheng et al, the authors leverage the tools of game theory and mechanism design to analyze the interaction of rational and selfish mobile users, then design efficient incentive mechanisms for four classical and representative applications in mobile Internet: dynamic spectrum redistribution, mobile crowdsensing, data marketplace, and cloud bandwidth management, to stimulate selfish mobile users to cooperate, achieving a win-win situation.…”
Section: Mechanism Design In Crowdsourcingmentioning
confidence: 99%