2019
DOI: 10.1002/ca.23341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cadaveric Study of Cutaneous Vascular Anatomy about the Elbow Using Computed Tomography Angiography

Abstract: The posterior approach is a commonly employed exposure of the elbow that provides excellent visualization and efficacy for various orthopedic procedures, including total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and fracture care. The posterior approach to the elbow has been associated with an increased rate of wound complications, including infection, skin necrosis, and wound dehiscence. Despite an association between these complications and decreased elbow perfusion, data regarding the intrinsic anatomic etiology for prefere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cadaveric study on the vascular anatomy about the elbow noted that at least one arterial anastomosis occurred after dislocation of the elbow. 16 Regarding the type of vascular reconstruction, it is recognized that primary repair of the injury is usually not possible because of the loss of artery length after its debridement. Most authors recommend resection of the damaged vessel segment and graft interposition using an inverted autologous vein segment (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cadaveric study on the vascular anatomy about the elbow noted that at least one arterial anastomosis occurred after dislocation of the elbow. 16 Regarding the type of vascular reconstruction, it is recognized that primary repair of the injury is usually not possible because of the loss of artery length after its debridement. Most authors recommend resection of the damaged vessel segment and graft interposition using an inverted autologous vein segment (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%