2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2023.100237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A carbon-neutrality-capacity index for evaluating carbon sink contributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the driving mechanism of forest restoration is also limited by natural background conditions and influenced by photosynthetic utilization efficiency (Yan et al, 2019; Xiao et al, 2023; Li et al, 2022), such as the fragile karst geological background in southern China, which restricts the sustainability of large‐scale concentrated afforestation (Zhang, Brandt, Yue, et al, 2022). However, a large number of carbonate rocks and other soluble rocks are widely distributed in the karst area of South China Karst, making this area have significant karst carbon sink potential (Bai et al, 2023; Xiong et al, 2022). In addition, The impact of such activities on vegetation restoration changes has both direct and indirect effects (Dana et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the driving mechanism of forest restoration is also limited by natural background conditions and influenced by photosynthetic utilization efficiency (Yan et al, 2019; Xiao et al, 2023; Li et al, 2022), such as the fragile karst geological background in southern China, which restricts the sustainability of large‐scale concentrated afforestation (Zhang, Brandt, Yue, et al, 2022). However, a large number of carbonate rocks and other soluble rocks are widely distributed in the karst area of South China Karst, making this area have significant karst carbon sink potential (Bai et al, 2023; Xiong et al, 2022). In addition, The impact of such activities on vegetation restoration changes has both direct and indirect effects (Dana et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of landscape pattern is a comprehensive reflection of the interaction and influence of natural elements and human factors in a certain region, as well as the different external characteristics and spatial combinations of various factors, which constantly affect the ecological process and marginal effect [13]. Exploring the evolution process of a landscape pattern is helpful for grasping the evolutionary characteristics and rules of the regional landscape, and to provide basic data for the assessment of the sensitivity, vulnerability and ecological risk of ecological degradation [14], which is the basis and important support for decision-makers to formulate reasonable and scientific urban planning [15]. At present, the analysis methods of landscape pattern evolution mainly include spatial statistical analysis, landscape index analysis and pattern dynamic model simulation [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fabrication of the SLM was inspired by a natural soil–microbe complex (Figure a). The soil ecosystem plays a key role in anthropogenic CO 2 sequestration, which can sink over one-third of the current yearly increase in atmospheric CO 2 . Moreover, soil as a natural porous biomaterial provides various microenvironments for myriad microbiota to support their high diversity and density . The soil–microbe interfaces mediate various biogeochemical cycles and can modulate microbes in response to the external environment. An artificial soil material was previously fabricated using a liquid-metal of gallium–indium (EGaIn), nanoclay, and starch for medical treatment, such as gut microbiome dysbiosis rectification and rodent colitis symptom alleviation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%