2005
DOI: 10.1086/431982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case-Control Study of Acute Respiratory Tract Infection in General Practice Patients in The Netherlands

Abstract: This study confirms that most ARTIs are viral and supports the reserved policy of prescribing antibiotics. In both case and control subjects, rhinovirus was the most common pathogen. Of bacterial infections, only group A beta-hemolytic streptococci were more common in case patients than in control subjects. Furthermore, we demonstrated that asymptomatic persons might be a neglected source of transmission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

19
154
6
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
19
154
6
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to bacterial agents, viruses were more commonly isolated among the study subjects. These findings are in agreement with the conclusions made by van Gageldonk-Laafeber et al [2] that reported that most ARI are viral.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to bacterial agents, viruses were more commonly isolated among the study subjects. These findings are in agreement with the conclusions made by van Gageldonk-Laafeber et al [2] that reported that most ARI are viral.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Parainfluenza 2 and hMPV viruses were not detected in any of the patient samples. Gageldonk-Laafeber et al [2] reported a predominant detection of Influenza and rhino viruses in a study in Netherlands. Findings of Ahmed et al [20] detected predominantly RSV (12.5%) and others were hMPV in 5.7%; Parainfluenza in 9.4%; Influenza A, 9.7%; and Influenza B in 2.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cell-culture isolates submitted to RIVM were passaged once, and subsequently tested using PCR assays for enteroviruses (Nix et al, 2006;Oberste et al, 1999), followed by parechoviruses . Samples that remained negative for enteroviruses and parechoviruses were screened using a broad range of PCR assays for noroviruses, rotaviruses A, B and C, adenoviruses, astroviruses, sapoviruses, vesiviruses, reoviruses, a generic PCR that detects both enteroviruses and rhinoviruses, hepatitis A and E viruses, influenza A and B viruses, Aichi virus, coronaviruses 229E, NL63 and OC43, human respiratory syncytial viruses A and B and human metapneumovirus, as described previously (Svraka et al, 2007(Svraka et al, , 2009avan der Sanden et al, 2008;van Gageldonk-Lafeber et al, 2005). Samples that tested negative in all assays but showed consistent CPE were processed for metagenomic sequencing (Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%