2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of Diphyllobothrium latum/nihonkaiense infection identified by capsule endoscopy in small intestine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent several cases, colonoscopy and capsule endoscopy were useful diagnostic methods for detecting D. latum and D. nihonkaiense infections [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. However, in our case, D. nihonkaiense infection could not be detected by colonoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent several cases, colonoscopy and capsule endoscopy were useful diagnostic methods for detecting D. latum and D. nihonkaiense infections [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. However, in our case, D. nihonkaiense infection could not be detected by colonoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a single scolex remains in the patient’s small intestine, the scolex will re-produce strobilas and finally develop another Diphyllobothriasis 13. In order to achieve full length investigation of intestine, capsule endoscopy may play a pivotal role to facilitate the diagnosis of the infestation in the small intestine 1416. Although there is further evaluation of this procedure in management of Diphyllobothriasis, it is an effective measure to shed light on the undetected worm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new, relatively non-invasive, technology has enabled, for the first time, the in vivo direct imaging of the small bowel lumen and mucosa, which has, thus far, been largely impossible. Some case reports have been published on the capsule endoscopy findings in cestode parasite infestation (3,5). However, the use of the endoscopy method was limited to the confirmation of the existence of the para-sites in these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%