2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-006-0370-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of human fasciolosis: discrepancy between egg size and genotype of Fasciola sp

Abstract: In human fasciolosis, differential diagnosis of the causative flukes, Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica, is problematic. We report a rare case of human fasciolosis in which an adult worm was recovered from the bile duct of a Japanese man. Morphometric data of the worm were consistent with those of F. hepatica, whereas the size of eggs in the stool indicated infection with F. gigantica. Nucleotide sequences of ITS-1 and -2 and CO1 genes of the DNA extracted from the eggs revealed that the genotype was th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Alexandria, Lower Egypt based on the size of the eggs, 51.3% of infections are caused by F. hepatica and 32.65% by F. gigantica but 16.32% have mixed infection (Allam, 1992). The present study agrees with Inoue et al (2007) that the size of eggs is not a suitable base for species identification, so all worm individual are identified as 68.89% F. gigantica and 30.3% F. hepatica and 0.79% was identified as a new strain. Jansen (1972) and Duewel (1982) reported unusually large-sized F. hepatica eggs in a Dutch strain from sheep, and did not accepted to use egg size in identification of Fasciola species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In Alexandria, Lower Egypt based on the size of the eggs, 51.3% of infections are caused by F. hepatica and 32.65% by F. gigantica but 16.32% have mixed infection (Allam, 1992). The present study agrees with Inoue et al (2007) that the size of eggs is not a suitable base for species identification, so all worm individual are identified as 68.89% F. gigantica and 30.3% F. hepatica and 0.79% was identified as a new strain. Jansen (1972) and Duewel (1982) reported unusually large-sized F. hepatica eggs in a Dutch strain from sheep, and did not accepted to use egg size in identification of Fasciola species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…isolates were located between the two species with more resemblance to F. hepatica isolates in a same clade with an intermediate form of Fasciola sp. from Japan (27). The haplotypes 2, 6, and 3 were remarkably similar to F. hepatica isolates from the northern province of Gilan (28) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…All of the DNA samples were stored at −20°C until further use. The nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial CO1 gene were amplified using the previously described methods (Itagaki et al 2005a;Inoue et al 2007) with some modification. The primer set used to amplify the CO1 fragment was Ita 8 and Ita 9 (Itagaki et al 2005a).…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%