“…Although the rational of Kaplan et al, (1994) can also be applied to cranial osteomata, Eshed et al (2002) suggested that, based on their histological features, these lesions be reclassified as hamartoma, a malformation that resembles a neoplasm but results from faulty development. In palaeopathological case reports of osteomata, these lesions are referred to as tumours, and the debate regarding their status as a neoplasm is either not mentioned or not discussed (Blau, 2006; Castro et al, 2019; Dąbrowski et al, 2015; Galassi et al, 2020; Giuffra et al, 2019; Licata, Borgo, Armocida, Nicosia, & Ferioli, 2016; Piombino‐Mascali, Zink, & Panzer, 2017; Premužić & Šikanjic, 2013; Odes et al, 2018; Smith, 2010; Zias, 2006). Bartelink and Wright (2011) seem to be the only researchers who did note this debate in their report of a mandibular tumour from Guatemala, dated to the 6 th to 9 th century CE.…”