A Case Study and Call to Action: Incorporating the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy in Undergraduate CS Courses

Abstract

Information literacy (IL) is fundamentally important for CS students and graduates who are required to write research papers and stay abreast of new technologies and ideas. However, IL is absent in CS curriculum guidelines and the literature is scarce on research focused on IL skills among CS students. In this paper, we discuss aspects of IL and introduce the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education in the context of an undergraduate CS course covering social issues. We share how we used the Framework as the basis of our learning activities, which included lectures, a reading, and an assignment in which students reflected on core ideas pertaining to IL. We analyzed responses from the assignment to assess whether students achieved our learning outcomes. Nearly all students recognized markers of scholarly authority, but fewer students achieved learning outcomes based on more abstract concepts. We provide recommendations on incorporating IL activities in CS courses, and encourage explicit interventions to improve CS students' IL skills.

Reaching into the basket of doom: Learning outcomes, discourse and information literacy

“…If they are not intended to be exhaustive, why are there so many of them and why are they so carefully and specifically articulated?’ Continued practitioner confusion (e.g. Baggett et al, 2018; Hendrigan et al, 2020) about the relationship between learning outcomes and knowledge practices further justified our decision to include these statements in our study.…”

The methodology used to deliver information literacy instruction by a select group of academic librarians: a case study

“…It was evident from the findings that the participants in the research utilized the ACRL framework as a guide for the development of content taught. The ACRL framework has been very effective in making instructional lessons more conversational interactive and hands-on, allowing students the opportunity to benefit from both implicit and explicit instructions (Hendrigan et al, 2020;Latham et al, 2019). In support of this, Hofer et al (2013) explain that the constant revision of the standards is important, especially in a time of post-Google information landscape where culturally, citizens are impacted by a myriad of emerging technologies and unprecedented modes of information access.…”