2015
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azu109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study Approach to Procedural Justice: Parents’ Views in Two Juvenile Delinquency Courts in the United States: Table A1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present research provides additional support for examining more proactive forms of legitimacy than narrowly focusing on deference and obedience to legal authorities (Bottoms & Tankebe, 2012;Jackson et al, 2011;Pennington, 2015;Tyler & Jackson, 2014). My findings demonstrated that in the legislative, regulatory process, parents became increasingly disengaged.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Directions For Researchsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present research provides additional support for examining more proactive forms of legitimacy than narrowly focusing on deference and obedience to legal authorities (Bottoms & Tankebe, 2012;Jackson et al, 2011;Pennington, 2015;Tyler & Jackson, 2014). My findings demonstrated that in the legislative, regulatory process, parents became increasingly disengaged.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Directions For Researchsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Hence my research using the FGC data would potentially have benefited from a case study approach, tracking the evolution of participant views throughout the ASEP, from recruitment to conclusion (see Pennington, 2015). The present research considered the legitimacy dialogue as a phenomenon involving interactions between families and schools at one point in time.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Directions For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers from across the globe are becoming increasingly interested in legitimacy in the context of criminal justice systems Jonathan-Zamir, Weisburd, & Hasisi, 2014 ;Meško & Tankebe, 2014 ;Bradford & Quinton, 2014 ;Peršak, 2014 ;Pennington, 2015 ;Tankebe & Liebling, 2013 ;. There is a growing body of observational evidence that legitimacy predicts self-reported offending behaviour (Cohn, Trinkner, Rebellon, Van Gundy, & Cole, 2012 ;Fagan & Piquero, 2007 ;Fagan & Tyler, 2005 ;Nivette, Eisner, Malti, & Ribeaud, 2014 ;cf.…”
Section: Expanding the Defi Nition And Motivating Power Of Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of understanding PL has captured increased scholarly attention by psychologists, sociologists, and criminologists (e.g., Pennington, 2015;. For this inquiry, we adopted Tom Tyler's definition of legitimacy used in several works (Fagan & Tyler, 2005;Sunshine & Tyler, 2003;Tyler, 2003Tyler, , 2006Tyler, , 2011Tyler et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%