2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study of subsequential intramedullary nails failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Kyle [44], the mechanical failure of IM nails has been attributed to two modes: plastic collapse and fatigue fracture. Nail failures have also been reported in Griza and co-workers [4][5][6]. Griza et al [4] compared the failure modes of a slotted and an unslotted nail.…”
Section: Casesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Kyle [44], the mechanical failure of IM nails has been attributed to two modes: plastic collapse and fatigue fracture. Nail failures have also been reported in Griza and co-workers [4][5][6]. Griza et al [4] compared the failure modes of a slotted and an unslotted nail.…”
Section: Casesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although intramedullary nailing has become a standard approach to stabilize fractured bone fragments, failures are still encountered as reported in several studies, emphasizing especially interlocking screw failures due to excessive bending and fatigue [1,2], bone refracture and nail failure [3][4][5][6]. With a need for improving these devices, it is imperative that the deflections of the implanted femur, stresses in the nail and screws, and the femoral strains be accurately predicted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there may be multiple successful combinations for a given case, each configuration has a relatively higher risk of failure when compared to a theoretically optimal construct . In the case of the IM nail fixation, clinical failures are reported in up to 14% of patients via, most commonly, fixation screw bending and fatigue, cut‐out, and nail failure . Excessive interfragmentary motion at the fracture site resulting from instability can result in high strain and disrupt healing, leading to nonunion .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In the case of the IM nail fixation, clinical failures are reported in up to 14% of patients 6 via, most commonly, fixation screw bending and fatigue, 7 cut-out, and nail failure. [8][9][10] Excessive interfragmentary motion at the fracture site resulting from instability can result in high strain and disrupt healing, leading to nonunion. 11 However, especially for patients with unstable fractures or compromised healing capacity, an optimized fixation construct can reduce the time required to achieve union and mitigate the risk of implant failure and nonunion events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the optimal treatment for severe bone fractures represents a debated question [3], stabilization of long bones fractures has been obtained more and more through intramedullary nails. That because this kind of approach is minimally invasive thus allowing patient early full weigh-bearing and reduces the long time immobilization problems [4]. Intramedullary nails, moreover, compared with other types of fixator, like the external implants (plates for osteosynthesis [5], present the advantage of reducing trauma to the soft tissues [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%