A Case Study of the New York City 2012-2013 Influenza Season With Daily Geocoded Twitter Data From Temporal and Spatiotemporal Perspectives

Abstract

BackgroundTwitter has shown some usefulness in predicting influenza cases on a weekly basis in multiple countries and on different geographic scales. Recently, Broniatowski and colleagues suggested Twitter’s relevance at the city-level for New York City. Here, we look to dive deeper into the case of New York City by analyzing daily Twitter data from temporal and spatiotemporal perspectives. Also, through manual coding of all tweets, we look to gain qualitative insights that can help direct future automated searches.ObjectiveThe intent of the study was first to validate the temporal predictive strength of daily Twitter data for influenza-like illness emergency department (ILI-ED) visits during the New York City 2012-2013 influenza season against other available and established datasets (Google search query, or GSQ), and second, to examine the spatial distribution and the spread of geocoded tweets as proxies for potential cases.MethodsFrom the Twitter Streaming API, 2972 tweets were collected in the New York City region matching the keywords “flu”, “influenza”, “gripe”, and “high fever”. The tweets were categorized according to the scheme developed by Lamb et al. A new fourth category was added as an evaluator guess for the probability of the subject(s) being sick to account for strength of confidence in the validity of the statement. Temporal correlations were made for tweets against daily ILI-ED visits and daily GSQ volume. The best models were used for linear regression for forecasting ILI visits. A weighted, retrospective Poisson model with SaTScan software (n=1484), and vector map were used for spatiotemporal analysis.ResultsInfection-related tweets (R=.763) correlated better than GSQ time series (R=.683) for the same keywords and had a lower mean average percent error (8.4 vs 11.8) for ILI-ED visit prediction in January, the most volatile month of flu. SaTScan identified primary outbreak cluster of high-probability infection tweets with a 2.74 relative risk ratio compared to medium-probability infection tweets at P=.001 in Northern Brooklyn, in a radius that includes Barclay’s Center and the Atlantic Avenue Terminal.ConclusionsWhile others have looked at weekly regional tweets, this study is the first to stress test Twitter for daily city-level data for New York City. Extraction of personal testimonies of infection-related tweets suggests Twitter’s strength both qualitatively and quantitatively for ILI-ED prediction compared to alternative daily datasets mixed with awareness-based data such as GSQ. Additionally, granular Twitter data provide important spatiotemporal insights. A tweet vector-map may be useful for visualization of city-level spread when local gold standard data are otherwise unavailable.

Better care through better use of data in GP–patient partnerships

“…Smart electricity meters collect data that might be used to predict whether older patients have fallen or have a change in daily living pattern indicating they have run into problems. 4 Studies from the US demonstrate that analysis of social media may identify symptoms related to disease outbreaks 5 or mental health problems. 6 Location technologies in mobile phones can track patients with dementia and alert health services if they are in danger.…”

Hidratos de carbono y práctica deportiva: una etnografía virtual en Twitter

“…Así, se ha utilizado esta red social como herramienta predictiva frente a fenómenos estacionales como la gripe (17), como un método para obtener datos epidemiológicos frente a nuevos usos de sustancias estupefacientes (18) o como herramienta de apoyo para dejar de fumar (19). Asimismo, actualmente se están desarrollando nuevas tecnologías y métodos de acceso y análisis a la enorme cantidad de información publicada en Twitter (20).…”

Using a Bayesian Method to Assess Google, Twitter, and Wikipedia for ILI Surveillance

“…Existing research has shown some promise of using data from Google, Twitter, and Wikipedia for influenza surveillance, but with conflicting findings, studies have only evaluated these web-based sources individually or dually without comparing all three of them [1][2][3][4][5] . A comparative analysis of all three web-based sources is needed to know which of the web-based sources performs best in order to be considered to complement traditional methods.…”