2000
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.1.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study on Support for Students' Thinking through Computer-Mediated Communication

Abstract: This is a case study on support for thinking through computer-mediated communication. Two graduate students were supervised in their research using computer-mediated communication, which was asynchronous and written; the supervisor was not present. The students' reports pointed out there was more planning and editing and low interactivity in this approach relative to face-to-face communication. These attributes were confirmed by their supervisor's report. The students also suggested that the latter was effecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many analyses (e.g., Althaus, 1997;Clawson & Choate, 1999;Hiltz, 1986;Kahn & Brookshire, 1991;Pena-Shaff, Martin, & Gay, 2001;Ricketts et al, 2000;Sannomiya & Kawaguchi, 2000;Swan et al, 2000;Usip & Bee, 1998;Wernet et al 2000) have used case studies to evaluate virtual classes. Hiltz evaluated an undergraduate and graduate course that used an online component in conjunction with a traditional class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many analyses (e.g., Althaus, 1997;Clawson & Choate, 1999;Hiltz, 1986;Kahn & Brookshire, 1991;Pena-Shaff, Martin, & Gay, 2001;Ricketts et al, 2000;Sannomiya & Kawaguchi, 2000;Swan et al, 2000;Usip & Bee, 1998;Wernet et al 2000) have used case studies to evaluate virtual classes. Hiltz evaluated an undergraduate and graduate course that used an online component in conjunction with a traditional class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sannomiya and Kawaguchi 41 report their experience with the supervision of research projects conducted by two graduate students, using computer‐mediated communication, which was asynchronous and transmitted to the faculty in the form of written essays. The students' reports pointed out that this approach required them to engage in more planning and editing of their communications with faculty than would have occurred if communication had transpired in face‐to‐face communications.…”
Section: Assessment Of Critical Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%