2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijpqm.2016.075250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study: to reduce process variability of valve seat depth in cylinder head using Six Sigma methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reducing annual rejection rate to more than 50 percent for cylinder head at a small- and medium-scale machining unit and achieving aggregate savings of about INR 19 million per annum (Parsana and Desai, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing annual rejection rate to more than 50 percent for cylinder head at a small- and medium-scale machining unit and achieving aggregate savings of about INR 19 million per annum (Parsana and Desai, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from above, few more successful implementations of Six Sigma in Indian industries are reported on the problem of rejection of welding electrodes due to variations in diameter of the manufactured units by Zaman et al (2013), on the flywheel casting process in foundry to minimize the defects in the process by Kumaravadivel and Natarajan (2013), in a manufacturing enterprise by identifying the root causes of failure for a welding defect resulting in quality and productivity improvement by Shashank et al (2013), at large food processing industries to address the problem of variations in the weight of milk powder pouch leading to the financial savings to the tune of INR 8,00,000 per annum by Desai et al (2015), on reducing annual rejection rate of the cylinder head at a small- and medium-scale machining unit and thus achieving aggregate savings of about INR 19 million per annum by Parsana and Desai (2016) and on reducing the external non-conformity from third-party inspection agency for a small-scale export-oriented unit industry and thus achieving savings of INR 81.70 lacs per annum by Prajapati and Desai (2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the point of view of improving the processes, to authors as Montgomery (2009), the improvement of the quality is the reduction of the variability in the processes and products. This definition implies that if the variability of the important characteristics of a product, process or service decreases, the quality of the product, process or service increases (Tejaskumar and Darshak, 2016;Sukrut and Mohammed, 2017). Therefore, increasing the competitiveness of a company is closely related to a continuous improvement of the quality in all its processes (Sasadhar and Indrajit, 2018;Selvam et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%